Violence Work: State Power and the Limits of Police
Abstract
In Violence Work Micol Seigel offers a new theorization of the quintessential incarnation of state power: the police. Foregrounding the interdependence of policing, the state, and global capital, Seigel redefines policing as “violence work,” showing how it is shaped by its role of channeling state violence. She traces this dynamic by examining the formation, demise, and aftermath of the U.S. State Department's Office of Public Safety (OPS), which between 1962 and 1974 specialized in training police forces internationally. Officially a civilian agency, the OPS grew and operated in military and counterinsurgency realms in ways that transgressed the borders that are meant to contain the police within civilian, public, and local spheres. Tracing the career paths of OPS agents after their agency closed, Seigel shows how police practices writ large are rooted in violence—especially against people of color, the poor, and working people—and how understanding police as a civilian, public, and local institution legitimizes state violence while preserving the myth of state benevolence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Policing has imperial origins.
“Scholars of American empire and policing have advanced an analysis of the imperial origins of policing ( McCoy 2009; Kuzmarov 2012; Seigel 2018; Schrader 2019a; Guariglia 2023; Go 2024).”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Seigel 2018
Policing was not an inherently local institution confined to municipal police departments.
“More directly, this work challenges the longstanding notion that policing was an inherently local institution confined to municipal police departments (Seigel 2018).”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Seigel 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mass Criminalization of Black Americans: A Historical Overview
Hinton, E., & Cook, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies
Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474516666281 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Seigel, M.
- Corresponding author
- Seigel, Micol
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2018-08-24
- OpenAlex
- W2890543463
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 18.44
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Keywords
- police, state violence, United States Department of State, police training, counterinsurgency, police militarization, global capital, state power, racial violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review