The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraventricular Thrombolysis Speeds Blood Clot Resolution: Results of a Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Animal models and clinical studies suggest that intraventricular thrombolysis improves clot resolution and clinical outcomes among patients with intraventricular hemorrhage. However, this intervention may increase the rates of rebleeding and infection. To assess the safety and efficacy of intraventricular thrombolysis, we conducted a pilot, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study. METHODS: Patients with intraventricular hemorrhage requiring ventriculostomy were randomized to receive intraventricular injections of normal saline solution or urokinase (25000 international units) at 12-hour intervals. Injections continued until ventricular drainage was discontinued according to prespecified clinical criteria. Head computed tomographic scans were obtained daily, for quantitative determinations of intraventricular hemorrhage volumes. The rate of clot resolution was estimated for each group. RESULTS: Twelve subjects were enrolled (urokinase, seven patients; placebo, five patients). Commercial withdrawal of urokinase precluded additional enrollment. The urokinase and placebo groups were similar with respect to age (49.6 versus 55.2 yr, P = 0.43) and presenting Glasgow Coma Scale scores (7.14 versus 8.00, P = 0.72). Randomization to the urokinase treatment arm (P = 0.02) and female sex (P = 0.008) favorably affected the clot resolution rate. The sex-adjusted clot half-life for the urokinase-treated group was reduced 44.6%, compared with the value for the placebo group (4.69 versus 8.48 d). CONCLUSION: Intraventricular thrombolysis with urokinase speeds the resolution of intraventricular blood clots, compared with treatment with ventricular drainage alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W. J., et al. (2022) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000407 · Cited by 1,639
Qureshi, A. I., Mendelow, A. D., & Hanley, D. F. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60371-8 · Cited by 1,526
Self-citationBroderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Self-citationComplications of intracerebral haemorrhage
Balami, J. S., & Buchan, A. M. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70264-2 · Cited by 444
(2006) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000094831 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Naff, N. J., Hanley, D. F., Keyl, P. M., Tuhrim, S., Kraut, M., Bederson, J., Bullock, R., Mayer, S. A., & Schmutzhard, E.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 577-584
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043525312
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraventricular Thrombolysis Speeds Blood Clot Resolution: Results of a Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000108422.10842.60
- The paper
- Naff, N. J., Hanley, D. F., Keyl, P. M., Tuhrim, S., Kraut, M., Bederson, J., Bullock, R., Mayer, S. A., & Schmutzhard, E. (2004). Intraventricular Thrombolysis Speeds Blood Clot Resolution: Results of a Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000108422.10842.60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.