Cited by 252Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsMeningioma and schwannoma management

Awake Mapping Optimizes the Extent of Resection for Low-Grade Gliomas in Eloquent Areas

De Benedictis, Alessandro, Moritz-Gasser, Sylvie, Duffau, Hugues·2010·Neurosurgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Awake craniotomy with intraoperative electrical mapping is a reliable method to minimize the risk of permanent deficit during surgery for low-grade glioma located within eloquent areas classically considered inoperable. However, it could be argued that preservation of functional sites might lead to a lesser degree of tumor removal. To the best of our knowledge, the extent of resection has never been directly compared between traditional and awake procedures. OBJECTIVE: We report for the first time a series of patients who underwent 2 consecutive surgeries without and with awake mapping. METHODS: Nine patients underwent surgery for a low-grade glioma in functional sites under general anesthesia in other institutions. The resection was subtotal in 3 cases and partial in 6 cases. There was a postoperative worsening in 3 cases. We performed a second surgery in the awake condition with intraoperative electrostimulation. The resection was performed according to functional boundaries at both the cortical and subcortical levels. RESULTS: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed that the resection was complete in 5 cases and subtotal in 4 cases (no partial removal) and that it was improved in all cases compared with the first surgery (P = .04). There was no permanent neurological worsening. Three patients improved compared with the presurgical status. All patients returned to normal professional and social lives. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that awake surgery, known to preserve the quality of life in patients with low-grade glioma, is also able to significantly improve the extent of resection for lesions located in functional regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1227/01.neu.0000369514.74284.78

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current surgical methods in neurooncology have led to significant advancements in patient outcome and the emergence of supramarginal resections.

    “Current surgical methods in neurooncology, including awake surgery, 80 cortical mapping, 28 and neurophysiological techniques, 13 have led to significant advancements in patient outcome and the emergence of supramarginal resections whereby tumor resections are extended to functional boundaries.54”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Benedictis, A., Moritz-Gasser, S., & Duffau, H.
Affiliations
University of Insubria (IT)
Venue
Neurosurgery
Published
2010-06
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
1074-1084
ISSN
0148-396X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019880473
Cited by
252
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Meningioma and schwannoma management
Keywords
low-grade glioma, awake craniotomy, extent of resection, eloquent brain areas, functional boundaries, general anesthesia comparison, postoperative neurological outcome
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Brain Neoplasms, Craniotomy, Electric Stimulation, Electrodiagnosis, Female, Glioma, Humans, Language Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life, Wakefulness, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Treatment Outcome, Neurosurgical Procedures, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review