Formation of the adult pigment pattern in zebrafish requires leopard and obelix dependent cell interactions
Abstract
Colour patterns are a prominent feature of many animals and are of high evolutionary relevance. In zebrafish, the adult pigment pattern comprises alternating stripes of two pigment cell types, melanophores and xanthophores. How the stripes are defined and a straight boundary is formed remains elusive. We find that mutants lacking one pigment cell type lack a striped pattern. Instead, cells of one type form characteristic patterns by homotypic interactions. Using mosaic analysis, we show that juxtaposition of melanophores and xanthophores suffices to restore stripe formation locally. Based on this, we have analysed the pigment pattern of two adult specific mutants: leopard and obelix. We demonstrate that obelix is required in melanophores to promote their aggregation and controls boundary integrity. By contrast, leopard regulates homotypic interaction within both melanophores and xanthophores, and interaction between the two, thus controlling boundary shape. These findings support a view in which cell-cell interactions among pigment cells are the major driving force for adult pigment pattern formation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
kcnj13 encodes a potassium channel required in melanophores for interactions with xanthophores and iridophores, regulating the shapes of all three pigment cell types.
“The kcnj13 gene encodes a potassium channel required in melanophores for interactions with xanthophores and iridophores, regulating the shapes of all three pigment cell types10–13.”
From Genomic and genetic insights into speciation and pigment pattern diversification in <i>Danio</i> fishes (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lu, J., Podobnik, M., Huang, J., McCluskey, B. M., McCarthy, S. A., Wood, J., Collins, J., Torrance, J., Sims, Y., Gao, D., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.17.682988 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maderspacher, F., & Nüsslein-Volhard, C.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology (DE)
- Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Abt. III/Genetik,Spemannstrasse 35, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3447-3457
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2084325983
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Keywords
- zebrafish, stripe formation, melanophores, xanthophores, cell-cell interactions, homotypic interactions, boundary integrity, mosaic analysis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Communication, Melanophores, Skin Pigmentation, Zebrafish, Cell Transplantation, Blastula
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review