The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands
Abstract
It has been postulated that the stem cells of somatic tissues protect themselves from mutation and cancer risk by selective segregation of their template DNA strands. Self-renewing mammary epithelial stem cells that were originated during allometric growth of the mammary ducts in pubertal females were labeled using [3H]-thymidine (3HTdR). After a prolonged chase during which much of the branching duct morphogenesis was completed, 3HTdR-label retaining epithelial cells (LREC) were detected among the epithelium of the maturing glands. Labeling newly synthesized DNA in these glands with a different marker, 5-bromodeoxyuridine(5BrdU), resulted in the appearance of doubly labeled nuclei in a large percentage of the LREC. By contrast, label-retaining cells within the stroma did not incorporate 5BrdU during the pulse, indicating that they were not traversing the cell cycle. Upon chase, the second label (5BrdU) was distributed from the double-labeled LREC to unlabeled mammary cells while 3HTdR was retained. These results demonstrate that mammary LREC selectively retain their 3HTdR-labeled template DNA strands and pass newly synthesized 5BrdU-labeled DNA to their progeny during asymmetric divisions. Similar results were obtained in mammary transplants containing self-renewing, lacZ-positive epithelial cells suggesting that cells capable of expansive self-renewal may repopulate new mammary stem cell niches during the allometric growth of new mammary ducts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T.-T., & Lavker, R. M. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90696-c · Cited by 2,276
Cited by
Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell
Shackleton, M., Vaillant, F., Simpson, K. J., Stingl, J., Smyth, G. K., Asselin-Labat, M.-L., Wu, L., Lindeman, G. J., & Visvader, J. E. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04372 · Cited by 2,005
Breast cancer: origins and evolution
Polyak, K. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci33295 · Cited by 697
Niche Regulation of Muscle Satellite Cell Self-Renewal and Differentiation
Kuang, S., Gillespie, M. A., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.12.012 · Cited by 507
Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells
Shinin, V., Gayraud-Morel, B., Gomès, D., & Tajbakhsh, S. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1425 · Cited by 504
Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU
Kiel, M. J., He, S., Ashkenazi, R., Gentry, S. N., Teta, M., Kushner, J. A., Jackson, T. L., & Morrison, S. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06115 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, G. H.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2005-02-15
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 681-687
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2089108952
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.