The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-renewing epiblast stem cells exhibit continual delineation of germ cells with epigenetic reprogramming in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Pluripotent epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) derived from postimplantation embryos exhibit properties that are characteristically different when compared with pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) derived from mouse blastocysts. However, EpiSCs are relatively less well characterised compared with ESCs. In particular, the relationship between EpiSCs and primordial germ cells (PGCs)is unknown, and is worthy of investigation because PGCs originate from postimplantation epiblast cells in vivo. We show that EpiSCs have an infinite capacity for generating PGCs, under conditions that sustain their pluripotency and self-renewal. These PGCs generated in vitro show appropriate transcriptional and epigenetic reprogramming events and are able to develop further into late germ cells. Notably, the PGCs can, in turn, be induced to undergo dedifferentiation into pluripotent embryonic germ cells (EGCs), which resemble ESCs and not the EpiSC from which they are derived. Our observations demonstrate intrinsic reprogramming during specification of PGCs that results in the erasure of epigenetic memory of EpiSCs following reactivation of the X-chromosome, DNA demethylation and re-expression of key pluripotency genes. This study provides novel insights into the nature and properties of EpiSCs,and introduces an in vitro model system that will be useful for investigations on PGC specification and on mechanisms regulating epigenetic reprogramming in germ cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconstitution of the Mouse Germ Cell Specification Pathway in Culture by Pluripotent Stem Cells
Hayashi, K., Ohta, H., Kurimoto, K., Aramaki, S., & Saitou, M. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.052 · Cited by 1,379
Self-citationHanna, J., Cheng, A. W., Saha, K., Kim, J., Lengner, C. J., Soldner, F., Cassady, J. P., Muffat, J., Carey, B. W., & Jaenisch, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004584107 · Cited by 847
Kojima, Y., Kaufman-Francis, K., Studdert, J. B., Steiner, K. A., Power, M. D., Loebel, D. A. F., Jones, V., Hor, A., de Alencastro, G., Logan, G. J., et al. (2014) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.09.014 · Cited by 302
Jackson, S. A., Schiesser, J., Stanley, E. G., & Elefanty, A. G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010706 · Cited by 67
Transplantable human thyroid organoids generated from embryonic stem cells to rescue hypothyroidism
Romitti, M., Tourneur, A., de Faria da Fonseca, B., Doumont, G., Gillotay, P., Liao, X.-H., Eski, S. E., Van Simaeys, G., Chomette, L., Lasolle, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34776-7 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayashi, K., & Surani, M. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2009-11-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3549-3556
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2142594935
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.