The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish
Open accessAbstract
Advances in imaging and cell-labeling techniques have greatly enhanced our understanding of developmental and neurobiological processes. Among vertebrates, zebrafish is uniquely suited for in vivo imaging owing to its small size and optical translucency. However, distinguishing and following cells over extended time periods remains difficult. Previous studies have demonstrated that Cre recombinase-mediated recombination can lead to combinatorial expression of spectrally distinct fluorescent proteins (RFP, YFP and CFP) in neighboring cells, creating a ‘Brainbow’ of colors. The random combination of fluorescent proteins provides a way to distinguish adjacent cells, visualize cellular interactions and perform lineage analyses. Here, we describe Zebrabow (Zebrafish Brainbow) tools for in vivo multicolor imaging in zebrafish. First, we show that the broadly expressed ubi:Zebrabow line provides diverse color profiles that can be optimized by modulating Cre activity. Second, we find that colors are inherited equally among daughter cells and remain stable throughout embryonic and larval stages. Third, we show that UAS:Zebrabow lines can be used in combination with Gal4 to generate broad or tissue-specific expression patterns and facilitate tracing of axonal processes. Fourth, we demonstrate that Zebrabow can be used for long-term lineage analysis. Using the cornea as a model system, we provide evidence that embryonic corneal epithelial clones are replaced by large, wedge-shaped clones formed by centripetal expansion of cells from the peripheral cornea. The Zebrabow tool set presented here provides a resource for next-generation color-based anatomical and lineage analyses in zebrafish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system
Livet, J., Weissman, T. A., Kang, H., Draft, R. W., Lu, J., Bennis, R. A., Sanes, J. R., & Lichtman, J. W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06293 · Cited by 1,876
Cited by
Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing
McKenna, A., Findlay, G. M., Gagnon, J. A., Horwitz, M. S., Schier, A. F., & Shendure, J. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf7907 · Cited by 766
Self-citationSimultaneous lineage tracing and cell-type identification using CRISPR–Cas9-induced genetic scars
Spanjaard, B., Hu, B., Mitic, N., Olivares-Chauvet, P., Janjuha, S., Ninov, N., & Junker, J. P. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4124 · Cited by 531
Single-cell analysis uncovers convergence of cell identities during axolotl limb regeneration
Gerber, T., Murawala, P., Knapp, D., Masselink, W., Schuez, M., Hermann, S., Gac-Santel, M., Nowoshilow, S., Kageyama, J., Khattak, S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0681 · Cited by 415
Myocardial Polyploidization Creates a Barrier to Heart Regeneration in Zebrafish
González-Rosa, J. M., Sharpe, M., Field, D., Soonpaa, M. H., Field, L. J., Burns, C. E., & Burns, C. G. (2018) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.021 · Cited by 264
Resistance to inflammation underlies enhanced fitness in clonal hematopoiesis
Avagyan, S., Henninger, J. E., Mannherz, W. P., Mistry, M., Yoon, J., Yang, S., Weber, M. C., Moore, J. L., & Zon, L. I. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba9304 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, Y. A., Freundlich, T., Weissman, T. A., Schoppik, D., Wang, X. C., Zimmerman, S., Ciruna, B., Sanes, J. R., Lichtman, J. W., & Schier, A. F.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2835-2846
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2043272632
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.