The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative splicing of fibronectin is temporally and spatially regulated in the chicken embryo
Abstract
The primary gene transcript for the adhesive extracellular matrix glycoprotein fibronectin (FN) is alternatively spliced in three regions (EIIIA, EIIIB and V). At least one of these regions (V) has been shown to encode cell-binding sites, suggesting that splicing represents a mechanism to create functionally different forms of FN at different times and places. In order to test this hypothesis, we have examined the extent of alternative splicing of fibronectin during embryonic development. The distribution of the different spliced forms of FN mRNA in developing chicken embryos was determined using probes specific for the spliced regions in ribonuclease protection and in situ hybridization experiments. At embryonic day 2–4 (E2–4), all three spliced regions were included wherever FN mRNA was detected. At E16, however, we found spatially distinct splicing differences within the embryo, with cell-type-specific splicing excluding EIIIA and/or EIIIB in some tissues. In contrast, we did not detect exclusion of the V region. In a more detailed developmental study of the simplest of these tissues, the chorioallantoic membrane, we found that EIIIB was preferentially excluded after the completion of growth. These results suggest that FN splicing is used during development as a mechanism to create different forms of FN within the extracellular matrix by the inclusion or exclusion of specific segments. The data are consistent with an essential role for one of these segments, E111B, in the migration and/or proliferation of embryonic cells prior to their terminal differentiation and also suggest possible roles for the EIIIA segment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ignotz, R. A., & Massagué, J. (1986) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)35666-1 · Cited by 2,492
Humphries, M. J., Akiyama, S. K., Komoriya, A., Olden, K., & Yamada, K. M. (1986) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.103.6.2637 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix
Adams, J. C., & Watt, F. M. (1993) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.117.4.1183 · Cited by 1,208
Transcriptome-wide Regulation of Pre-mRNA Splicing and mRNA Localization by Muscleblind Proteins
Wang, E. T., Cody, N. A. L., Jog, S., Biancolella, M., Wang, T. T., Treacy, D. J., Luo, S., Schroth, G. P., Housman, D. E., Reddy, S., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.041 · Cited by 490
Muro, A. F., Chauhan, A. K., Gajovic, S., Iaconcig, A., Porro, F., Stanta, G., & Baralle, F. E. (2003) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200212079 · Cited by 319
Cell–matrix adhesion in vascular development
HYNES, R. O. (2007) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02569.x · Cited by 261
Self-citationAstrof, S., Crowley, D., & Hynes, R. O. (2007) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.005 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ffrench-Constant, C., & Hynes, R. O.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 375-388
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2398689627
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.