The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain
Abstract
Development in the chick hindbrain is founded on a segmented pattern. Groups of cells are allocated to particular segmental levels early in development, the cells of each segment (rhombomere) mixing freely with each other, but not with those of adjacent segments. After rhombomere formation, cells in the boundary regions become increasingly specialised. Rhombomeres are thus separate territories that will ultimately pursue different developmental fates. We are investigating the mechanisms that establish and maintain the pattern of rhombomeres and their boundaries. Donor-to-host transplantation experiments were used to confront tissue from different axial levels within the hindbrain. The frequency of boundary regeneration and patterning in the hindbrain was then assessed, based on gross morphology, arrangement of motor neurons and immunohistochemistry. We found that when rhombomeres from adjacent positions or positions three rhombomeres distant from one another were confronted, a normal boundary was invariably reconstructed. Juxtaposition of rhombomere 5 with 7 also yielded a new boundary. By contrast, donor and host tissue of the same positional origin combined without forming a boundary. The same result was obtained in combinations of rhombomeres 3 and 5. Confrontation of tissue from even-numbered rhombomeres 4 with 6 or 2 with 4 also failed to regenerate a boundary in the majority of cases. These results suggest that cell surface properties vary according to rhombomeric level in the hindbrain, and may support the idea of a two-segment periodicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Homeobox genes and axial patterning
McGinnis, W., & Krumlauf, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n · Cited by 2,674
Patterning the cranial neural crest: Hinbrain segmentation and hox gene plasticity
Trainor, P. A., & Krumlauf, R. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35039056 · Cited by 349
Biological Physics of the Developing Embryo
Forgacs, G., & Newman, S. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755576 · Cited by 339
Gli3 is required for Emx gene expression during dorsal telencephalon development
Theil, T., Alvarez-Bolado, G., Walter, A., & Rüther, U. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.16.3561 · Cited by 228
Chapter 8 Hox Genes and Segmentation of the Vertebrate Hindbrain
Tümpel, S., Wiedemann, L. M., & Krumlauf, R. (2009) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(09)88004-6 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Guthrie, S., & Lumsden, A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-05-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1852706845
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.