The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks tworhombomeres
Abstract
kreisler is a recessive mutation resulting in gross malformation of the inner ear of homozygous mice. The defects in the inner ear are related to abnormalities in the hindbrain of the embryo, adjacent to the ear rudiments. At E9.5, the neural tube posterior to the boundary between the third and fourth rhombomeres, r3 and r4, appears unsegmented, and the region that would normally correspond to r4 is unusually thick-walled and contains many dying cells. The absence of morphological segmentation in the posterior hindbrain corresponds to an altered pattern of gene expression in that region, with major abnormalities posterior to the r4/5 boundary and minor abnormalities anterior to it. From the expression patterns at E9.5 of Krox-20, Hoxb-1 (Hox 2.9), Hoxb-2 (Hox 2.8), Hoxa-3 (Hox 1.5), Hoxd-4 (Hox 4.2) and cellular retinoic-acid binding protein I (CRABP I), it appears that the fundamental defect is a loss of r5 and r6. Correspondingly, the glossopharyngeal ganglion and nerve, associated with r6 are missing and the abducens nerve, which originates from r5 and r6, is also absent. Examination of Krox-20 expression at stages as early as E8.5 indicates that Krox-20 fails ever to be expressed in its r5 domain in the homozygous kreisler mutant. The abnormal amount of cell death is seen only later. An interpretation is that the cells that would normally become specified at an early stage as r5 and r6 adopt an r4 character instead, producing an excess of r4 cells that is disposed of subsequently by cell death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hox genes in vertebrate development
Krumlauf, R. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90290-9 · Cited by 2,073
Self-citationA subset of p53-deficient embryos exhibit exencephaly
Sah, V. P., Attardi, L. D., Mulligan, G. J., Williams, B. O., Bronson, R. T., & Jacks, T. (1995) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0695-175 · Cited by 580
Fernandez, A. S., Pieau, C., Repérant, J., Boncinelli, E., & Wassef, M. (1998) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.125.11.2099 · Cited by 362
Fgf3 and Fgf10 are required for mouse otic placode induction
Wright, T. J., & Mansour, S. L. (2003) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00555 · Cited by 288
Chapter 8 Hox Genes and Segmentation of the Vertebrate Hindbrain
Tümpel, S., Wiedemann, L. M., & Krumlauf, R. (2009) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(09)88004-6 · Cited by 150
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McKay, I. J., Muchamore, I., Krumlauf, R., Maden, M., Lumsden, A., & Lewis, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2199-2211
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1939766922
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks tworhombomeres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.120.8.2199
- The paper
- McKay, I. J., Muchamore, I., Krumlauf, R., Maden, M., Lumsden, A., & Lewis, J. (1994). The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks tworhombomeres. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.120.8.2199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.