Cited by 71Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchRenal and related cancers

Isolation of novel tissue-specific genes from cDNA libraries representing the individual tissue constituents of the gastrulating mouse embryo

Harrison, S. M., Dunwoodie, S. L., Arkell, R. M., Lehrach, H., Beddington, R. S. P.·1995·Development

Abstract

A total of 5 conventional, directionally cloned plasmid cDNA libraries have been constructed from the entire embryonic region of the mid-gastrulation mouse embryo and from its four principal tissue constituents (ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm and primitive streak). These libraries have been validated with respect to the number of independent clones, insert-size and appropriate representation of diagnostic marker genes. Subtractive hybridisation has been used to remove clones common to the Endoderm and Mesoderm cDNA libraries resulting in an Endoderm minus Mesoderm subtracted library. Probe prepared from this subtracted library has been hybridised to a grid containing approximately 18,500 Embryonic Region library clones. Three novel clones have been recovered as well as expected genes already known to be highly expressed in the primitive endoderm lineage at this stage of development. In situ hybridisation to early postim-plantation embryos has revealed the expression patterns of these novel genes. One is highly expressed exclusively in visceral endoderm, one is expressed in ectodermal and endodermal tissues, and the third proves to be an early marker of prospective and differentiated surface ectoderm as well as being expressed in endoderm and its derivatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.121.8.2479

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sousa-Nunes et al. identified 29/160 (18%) genes with restricted expression patterns from E7.5 mouse endoderm cDNA libraries using non-redundant sequence-based selection and in situ hybridization, but not all were endoderm enriched.

    “Sousa-Nunes et al. identified 29/160 (18%) genes with restricted expression patterns from E7.5 mouse endoderm cDNA libraries using non-redundant sequence-based selection and in situ hybridization, but not all of these genes were endoderm enriched in their expression [40,41].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, S. M., Dunwoodie, S. L., Arkell, R. M., Lehrach, H., & Beddington, R. S. P.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (DE)
Venue
Development
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
121
Issue
8
Pages
2479-2489
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2105991972
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Renal and related cancers
Keywords
tissue-specific genes, mouse embryo, gastrulation, cDNA library, endoderm, mesoderm, ectoderm, primitive streak, visceral endoderm, surface ectoderm, gene expression patterns, embryonic development, novel genes
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cloning, Molecular, Ectoderm, Endoderm, Gastrula, Mesoderm, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Molecular Sequence Data, Plasmids, Blotting, Southern, Gene Library, Gene Expression, In Situ Hybridization, DNA, Complementary, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review