The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy
Abstract
Previous studies have provided a detailed model for the regulation of even-skipped (eve) stripe 2 expression in the Drosophila embryo. The bicoid (bcd) regulatory gradient triggers the expression of hunchback (hb); these work synergistically to activate the stripe in the anterior half of the embryo. bcd also coordinates the expression of two repressors, giant (gt) and Kruppel (Kr), which define the anterior and posterior borders of the stripe, respectively. Here, we report the findings of extensive cis- and trans-complementation analyses using a series of defective stripe 2 enhancers in transgenic embryos. This study reaches two primary conclusions. First, the stripe 2 enhancer is inherently ‘sensitized’ for repression by gt. We propose that gt specifies the sharp anterior stripe border by blocking two tiers of transcriptional synergy, cooperative binding to DNA and cooperative contact of bound activators with the transcription complex. Second, we find that the synergistic activity of hb and bcd is ‘promiscuous’. For example, a maternally expressed Gal4-Sp1 fusion protein can functionally replace hb in the stripe 2 enhancer. This finding challenges previous proposals for dedicated hb and bcd interactions in the segmentation process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activating transcription factors Bicoid and Hunchback are expressed only in the anterior section of the embryo, while repressors Giant and Kruppel are expressed in anterior and posterior regions on either side of stripe 2, such that the stripe 2 enhancer is only activated within a 2-3 cell-wide section of the embryo.
“Activating TFs Bicoid and Hunchback are expressed only in the anterior section of the embryo, while the repressors Giant and Kruppel are expressed in anterior and posterior regions on either side of stripe 2, such that the stripe 2 enhancer is only activated within a 2–3 cell-wide section of the embryo [108, 121, 124].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [124]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Arnosti, D. N., Barolo, S., Levine, M., & Small, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-214
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2130174998
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM034431, GM34431)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- transcriptional synergy, hunchback, Bicoid, giants, Krüppel, enhancer repression, cis-regulatory elements
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Female, Genetic Complementation Test, Juvenile Hormones, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Genes, Insect, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review