The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Musculoskeletal patterning in the pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish embryo
Abstract
The head skeleton and muscles of the zebrafish develop in a stereotyped pattern in the embryo, including seven pharyngeal arches and a basicranium underlying the brain and sense organs. To investigate how individual cartilages and muscles are specified and organized within each head segment, we have examined their early differentiation using Alcian labeling of cartilage and expression of several molecular markers of muscle cells. Zebrafish larvae begin feeding by four days after fertilization, but cartilage and muscle precursors develop in the pharyngeal arches up to 2 days earlier. These chondroblasts and myoblasts lie close together within each segment and differentiate in synchrony, perhaps reflecting the interdependent nature of their patterning. Initially, cells within a segment condense and gradually become subdivided into individual dorsal and ventral structures of the differentiated arch. Cartilages or muscles in one segment show similar patterns of condensation and differentiation as their homologues in another, but vary in size and shape in the most anterior (mandibular and hyoid) and posterior (tooth-bearing) arches, possibly as a consequence of changes in the timing of their development. Our results reveal a segmental scaffold of early cartilage and muscle precursors and suggest that interactions between them coordinate their patterning in the embryo. These data provide a descriptive basis for genetic analyses of craniofacial patterning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies on the structure & development of vertebrates
Goodrich, E. S. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82144 · Cited by 1,082
Cited by
Parichy, D. M., Elizondo, M. R., Mills, M. G., Gordon, T. N., & Engeszer, R. E. (2009) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.22113 · Cited by 832
sucker encodes a zebrafish Endothelin-1 required for ventral pharyngeal arch development
Miller, C. T., Schilling, Lee, Parker, J., & Kimmel, C. B. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.17.3815 · Cited by 259
Self-citationAn ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws
Fraser, G. J., Hulsey, C. D., Bloomquist, R. F., Uyesugi, K., Manley, N. R., & Streelman, J. T. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000031 · Cited by 228
Zebrafish foxd3 is selectively required for neural crest specification, migration and survival
Stewart, R. A., Arduini, B. L., Berghmans, S., George, R. E., Kanki, J. P., Henion, P. D., & Look, A. T. (2006) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.035 · Cited by 180
Knight, R. D., Javidan, Y., Nelson, S., Zhang, T., & Schilling, T. (2004) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.10494 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilling, T. F., & Kimmel, C. B.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2945-2960
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2122920636
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.