The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1
Abstract
Vegetative and reproductive phases alternate regularly during sympodial growth in tomato. In wild-type ‘indeterminate’ plants, inflorescences are separated by three vegetative nodes. In ‘determinate’ plants homozygous for the recessive allele of the SELF-PRUNING (SP) gene, sympodial segments develop progressively fewer nodes until the shoot is terminated by two consecutive inflorescences. We show here that the SP gene is the tomato ortholog of CENTRORADIALIS and TERMINAL FLOWER1, genes which maintain the indeterminate state of inflorescence meristems in Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis respectively. The sp mutation results in a single amino acid change (P76L), and the mutant phenotype is mimicked by overexpressing the SP antisense RNA. Ectopic and overexpression of the SP and CEN transgenes in tomato rescues the ‘indeterminate’ phenotype, conditions the replacement of flowers by leaves in the inflorescence and suppresses the transition of the vegetative apex to a reproductive shoot. The SELF-PRUNING gene is expressed in shoot apices and leaves from very early stages, and later in inflorescence and floral primordia as well. This expression pattern is similar to that displayed by the tomato ortholog LEAFY and FLORICAULA. Comparison of the sympodial, day-neutral shoot system of tomato and the monopodial, photoperiod-sensitive systems of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum suggests that flowering genes that are required for the processing of floral induction signals in Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum are required in tomato to regulate the alternation between vegetative and reproductive cycles in sympodial meristems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution
The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11119 · Cited by 3,289
Genetic Regulation of Shoot Architecture
Wang, B., Smith, S. M., & Li, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040422 · Cited by 760
Ronen, G., Carmel-Goren, L., Zamir, D., & Hirschberg, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.190177497 · Cited by 623
Self-citationRapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing
Lemmon, Z. H., Reem, N. T., Dalrymple, J., Soyk, S., Swartwood, K. E., Rodriguez-Leal, D., Van Eck, J., & Lippman, Z. B. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x · Cited by 518
Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean
Tian, Z., Wang, X., Lee, R., Li, Y., Specht, J. E., Nelson, R. L., McClean, P. E., Qiu, L., & Ma, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000088107 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Pnueli, L., Carmel-Goren, L., Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Alvarez, J., Ganal, M., Zamir, D., & Lifschitz, E.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1979-1989
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2152008652
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.125.11.1979
- The paper
- Pnueli, L., Carmel-Goren, L., Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Alvarez, J., Ganal, M., Zamir, D., & Lifschitz, E. (1998). The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.11.1979
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.