The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch
Abstract
The analysis of Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 null mutants suggested that these genes are involved in distinct aspects of hindbrain segmentation and specification. Here we investigate the possible functional synergy of the two genes. The generation of Hoxa13′RARE/Hoxb13′RARE compound mutants resulted in mild facial motor nerve defects reminiscent of those present in the Hoxb1 null mutants. Strong genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 were uncovered by introducing the Hoxb13′RARE and Hoxb1 null mutations into the Hoxa1 null genetic background. Hoxa1null/Hoxb13′RARE and Hoxa1null/Hoxb1null double homozygous embryos showed additional patterning defects in the r4-r6 region but maintained a molecularly distinct r4-like territory. Neurofilament staining and retrograde labelling of motor neurons indicated that Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergise in patterning the VIIth through XIth cranial nerves. The second arch expression of neural crest cell markers was abolished or dramatically reduced, suggesting a defect in this cell population. Strikingly, the second arch of the double mutant embryos involuted by 10.5 dpc and this resulted in loss of all second arch-derived elements and complete disruption of external and middle ear development. Additional defects, most notably the lack of tympanic ring, were found in first arch-derived elements, suggesting that interactions between first and second arch take place during development. Taken together, our results unveil an extensive functional synergy between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 that was not anticipated from the phenotypes of the simple null mutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations
Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531 · Cited by 3,529
Rice, D., & Barone, S. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s3511 · Cited by 2,944
A Hox regulatory network establishes motor neuron pool identity and target-muscle connectivity
Dasen, J. S., Tice, B. C., Brenner-Morton, S., & Jessell, T. M. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.009 · Cited by 461
T HE R OLE OF V ITAMIN A IN M AMMALIAN R EPRODUCTION AND E MBRYONIC D EVELOPMENT
Clagett-Dame, M., & DeLuca, H. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.010402.102745e · Cited by 461
Cranial neural crest and the building of the vertebrate head
Santagati, F., & Rijli, F. M. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1221 · Cited by 461
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavalas, A., Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Rijli, F. M., Krumlauf, R., & Chambon, P.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-03-15
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1123-1136
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2135980041
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.125.6.1123
- The paper
- Gavalas, A., Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Rijli, F. M., Krumlauf, R., & Chambon, P. (1998). Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.6.1123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.