The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The CArG boxes in the promoter of the Arabidopsis floral organ identity gene APETALA3 mediate diverse regulatory effects
Abstract
APETALA3 is a MADS box gene required for normal development of the petals and stamens in the Arabidopsis flower. Studies in yeast, mammals and plants demonstrate that MADS domain transcription factors bind with high affinity to a consensus sequence called the CArG box. The APETALA3 promoter contains three close matches to the consensus CArG box sequence. To gain insights into the APETALA3 regulatory circuitry, we have analyzed the APETALA3 promoter using AP3::uidA(GUS) fusions. 496 base pairs of APETALA3 promoter sequence 5′ to the transcriptional start directs GUS activity in the same temporal and spatial expression pattern as the APETALA3 RNA and protein in wild-type flowers. A synthetic promoter consisting of three tandem repeats of a 143 base pair sequence directs reporter gene activity exclusively to petals and stamens in the flower. We have analyzed the role of the CArG boxes by site-specific mutagenesis and find that the three CArG boxes mediate discrete regulatory effects. Mutations in CArG1 result in a decrease in reporter expression suggesting that CArG1 is the binding site for a positively acting factor or factors. Mutations in CArG2 result in a decrease in reporter expression in petals, but the expression pattern in stamens is unchanged. By contrast, mutations in CArG3 result in an increase in the level of reporter gene activity during early floral stages suggesting that CArG3 is the binding site for a negatively acting factor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early flower development in Arabidopsis.
Smyth, D. R., Bowman, J. L., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1990) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.2.8.755 · Cited by 2,155
Cited by
A short history of MADS-box genes in plants
Theissen, G., Becker, A., Di Rosa, A., Kanno, A., Kim, J. T., Münster, T., Winter, K.-U., & Saedler, H. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006332105728 · Cited by 632
Function and evolution of the plant MADS-box gene family
Ng, M., & Yanofsky, M. F. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35056041 · Cited by 438
Alvarez-Buylla, E. R., Benítez, M., Corvera-Poiré, A., Chaos Cador, Á., de Folter, S., Gamboa de Buen, A., Garay-Arroyo, A., García-Ponce, B., Jaimes-Miranda, F., Pérez-Ruiz, R. V., et al. (2010) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0127 · Cited by 298
Specification of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by repression of flowering time genes
Liu, C., Zhou, J., Bracha-Drori, K., Yalovsky, S., Ito, T., & Yu, H. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.003103 · Cited by 286
(2023) · doi:10.1038/s41477-022-01336-2 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilly, J. J., Allen, D. W., & Jack, T.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1647-1657
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2171713538
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.