The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refined analysis of early symbiotic steps of the Rhizobium-Medicago interaction in relationship with microtubular cytoskeleton rearrangements
Abstract
In situ immunolocalization of tubulin revealed that important rearrangements occur during all the early symbiotic steps in the Medicago/R. meliloti symbiotic interaction. Microtubular cytoskeleton (MtC) reorganizations were observed in inner tissues, first in the pericycle and then in the inner cortex where the nodule primordium forms. Subsequently, major MtC changes occurred in outer tissues, associated with root hair activation and curling, the formation of preinfection threads (PITs) and the initiation and the growth of an infection network. From the observed sequence of MtC changes, we propose a model which aims to better define, at the histological level, the timing of the early symbiotic stages. This model suggests the existence of two opposite gradients of cell differentiation controlling respectively the formation of division centers in the inner cortex and plant preparation for infection. It implies that (i) MtC rearrangements occur in pericycle and inner cortex earlier than in the root hair, (ii) the infection process proceeds prior to the formation of the nodule meristem, (iii) the initial primordium prefigures the future zone II of the mature nodule and (iv) the nodule meristem derives from the nodule primordium. Finally, our data also strongly suggest that in alfalfa PIT differentiation, a stage essential for successful infection, requires complementary signaling additional to Nod factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mylona, P., Pawlowski, K., & Bisseling, T. (1995) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.7.7.869 · Cited by 692
Cited by
How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium–Medicago model
Jones, K. M., Kobayashi, H., Davies, B. W., Taga, M. E., & Walker, G. C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1705 · Cited by 937
Gage, D. J. (2004) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.2.280-300.2004 · Cited by 913
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
Arrighi, J.-F., Barre, A., Ben Amor, B., Bersoult, A., Soriano, L. C., Mirabella, R., de Carvalho-Niebel, F., Journet, E.-P., Ghérardi, M., Huguet, T., et al. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.084657 · Cited by 526
Genre, A., Chabaud, M., Timmers, T., Bonfante, P., & Barker, D. G. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.035410 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Timmers, A. C. J., Auriac, M.-C., & Truchet, G.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-08-15
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3617-3628
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2115926081
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refined analysis of early symbiotic steps of the Rhizobium-Medicago interaction in relationship with microtubular cytoskeleton rearrangements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.126.16.3617
- The paper
- Timmers, A. C. J., Auriac, M.-C., & Truchet, G. (1999). Refined analysis of early symbiotic steps of the Rhizobium-Medicago interaction in relationship with microtubular cytoskeleton rearrangements. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.16.3617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.