The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 delineate early steps in differentiation of neural stem cells in the developing central nervous system
Abstract
Like other tissues and organs in vertebrates, multipotential stem cells serve as the origin of diverse cell types during genesis of the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). During early development, stem cells self-renew and increase their total cell numbers without overt differentiation. At later stages, the cells withdraw from this self-renewal mode, and are fated to differentiate into neurons and glia in a spatially and temporally regulated manner. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this important step in cell differentiation remain poorly understood. In this study, we present evidence that the expression and function of the neural-specific transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 are involved in this process. In vivo, Mash-1- and Prox-1-expressing cells were defined as a transient proliferating population that was molecularly distinct from self-renewing stem cells. By taking advantage of in vitro culture systems, we showed that induction of Mash-1 and Prox-1 coincided with an initial step of differentiation of stem cells. Furthermore, forced expression of Mash-1 led to the down-regulation of nestin, a marker for undifferentiated neuroepithelial cells, and up-regulation of Prox-1, suggesting that Mash-1 positively regulates cell differentiation. In support of these observations in vitro, we found specific defects in cellular differentiation and loss of expression of Prox-1 in the developing brain of Mash-1 mutant mice in vivo. Thus, we propose that induction of Mash-1 and Prox-1 is one of the critical molecular events that control early development of the CNS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fode, C., Ma, Q., Casarosa, S., Ang, S.-L., Anderson, D. J., & Guillemot, F. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.1.67 · Cited by 624
Self-citationTeleostean and mammalian forebrains contrasted: Evidence from genes to behavior
Wullimann, M. F., & Mueller, T. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20183 · Cited by 491
Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation
Doe, C. Q. (2008) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.014977 · Cited by 420
Takebayashi, H., Yoshida, S., Sugimori, M., Kosako, H., Kominami, R., Nakafuku, M., & Nabeshima, Y.-I. (2000) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00466-4 · Cited by 386
Self-citationThe bHLH Gene Hes1 as a Repressor of the Neuronal Commitment of CNS Stem Cells
Nakamura, Y., Sakakibara, S.-I., Miyata, T., Ogawa, M., Shimazaki, T., Weiss, S., Kageyama, R., & Okano, H. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-01-00283.2000 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Torii, M.-A., Matsuzaki, F., Osumi, N., Kaibuchi, K., Nakamura, S., Casarosa, S., Guillemot, F., & Nakafuku, M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-456
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2126071076
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 delineate early steps in differentiation of neural stem cells in the developing central nervous system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.126.3.443
- The paper
- Torii, M.-A., Matsuzaki, F., Osumi, N., Kaibuchi, K., Nakamura, S., Casarosa, S., Guillemot, F., & Nakafuku, M. (1999). Transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 delineate early steps in differentiation of neural stem cells in the developing central nervous system. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.3.443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.