Zebrafish kit mutation reveals primary and secondary regulation of melanocyte development during fin stripe regeneration
Abstract
Fin regeneration in adult zebrafish is accompanied by reestablishment of the pigment stripes. To understand the mechanisms underlying fin stripe regeneration and regulation of normal melanocyte stripe morphology, we investigated the origins of melanocytes in the regenerating fin and their requirement for the kit receptor tyrosine kinase. Using pre-existing melanin as a lineage tracer, we show that most fin regeneration melanocytes develop from undifferentiated precursors, rather than from differentiated melanocytes. Mutational analysis reveals two distinct classes of regeneration melanocytes. First, an early regeneration class develops dependent on kit function. In the absence of kit function and kit-dependent melanocytes, a second class of melanocytes develops at later stages of regeneration. This late kit-independent class of regeneration melanocytes has little or no role in wild-type fin stripe development, thus revealing a secondary mode for regulation of fin stripes. Expression of melanocyte markers in regenerating kit mutant fins suggests that kit normally acts after mitf and before dct to promote development of the primary kit-dependent melanocytes. kit-dependent and kit-independent melanocytes are also present during fin stripe ontogeny in patterns similar to those observed during regeneration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Melanin and melanosomes are stable under a variety of conditions and persist when melanogenesis is inhibited.
“Melanin and melanosomes are stable under a variety of conditions and persist when melanogenesis is inhibited (10, 11).”
From Agouti and BMP signaling drive a naturally occurring fate conversion of melanophores to leucophores in zebrafish (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huang, D., Kapadia, E. H., Liang, Y., Shriver, L. P., Dai, S., Patti, G. J., Humbel, B. M., Laudet, V., & Parichy, D. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2424180122 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rawls, J. F., & Johnson, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Stephen L.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3715-3724
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2170943429
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM056988)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- melanocyte development, fin regeneration, KIT receptor tyrosine kinase, KIT mutations, melanocyte precursors, MITF, discrete cosine transform, lineage tracing, zebrafish
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Melanocytes, Pigmentation, Regeneration, Stem Cells, Zebrafish, Mutagenesis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review