Formation of neuroblasts in the embryonic central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster is controlled by SoxNeuro
Abstract
Sox proteins form a family of HMG-box transcription factors related to the mammalian testis determining factor SRY. Sox-mediated modulation of gene expression plays an important role in various developmental contexts. Drosophila SoxNeuro, a putative ortholog of the vertebrate Sox1, Sox2 and Sox3 proteins, is one of the earliest transcription factors to be expressed pan-neuroectodermally. We demonstrate that SoxNeuro is essential for the formation of the neural progenitor cells in central nervous system. We show that loss of function mutations of SoxNeuro are associated with a spatially restricted hypoplasia: neuroblast formation is severely affected in the lateral and intermediate regions of the central nervous system, whereas ventral neuroblast formation is almost normal. We present evidence that a requirement for SoxNeuro in ventral neuroblast formation is masked by a functional redundancy with Dichaete, a second Sox protein whose expression partially overlaps that of SoxNeuro. Genetic interactions of SoxNeuro and the dorsoventral patterning genes ventral nerve chord defective and intermediate neuroblasts defective underlie ventral and intermediate neuroblast formation. Finally, the expression of the Achaete-Scute gene complex suggests that SoxNeuro acts upstream and in parallel with the proneural genes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expression pattern driven by the soxB2 CNRs is reminiscent of that of Drosophila sox neuro, a SoxB1 class gene.
“The expression pattern driven by these CNRs is reminiscent of that of Drosophila sox neuro (33, 34), a SoxB1 class gene.”
From Transphyletic conservation of developmental regulatory state in animal evolution (2011) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Buescher, M., Hing, F. S., & Chia, W.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (SG)
- ORCID
- Buescher, Marita
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-09-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4193-4203
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2131067007
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Keywords
- Drosophila melanogaster, embryonic central nervous system, neural progenitor cells, functional redundancy, dorsoventral patterning, achaete-scute complex, proneural genes, neuroectoderm, HMG-box transcription factor, hypoplasia
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Drosophila melanogaster, High Mobility Group Proteins, Morphogenesis, Nervous System, Neurons, Species Specificity, Stem Cells, Transcription Factors, Xenopus, Conserved Sequence, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Insect Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, SOX Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review