The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Math3 and NeuroD regulate amacrine cell fate specification in the retina
Abstract
The basic helix-loop-helix genes Math3 and NeuroD are expressed by differentiating amacrine cells, retinal interneurons. Previous studies have demonstrated that a normal number of amacrine cells is generated in mice lacking either Math3 or NeuroD. We have found that, in Math3-NeuroD double-mutant retina, amacrine cells are completely missing, while ganglion and Müller glial cells are increased in number. In the double-mutant retina, the cells that would normally differentiate into amacrine cells did not die but adopted the ganglion and glial cell fates. Misexpression studies using the developing retinal explant cultures showed that, although Math3 and NeuroD alone only promoted rod genesis, they significantly increased the population of amacrine cells when the homeobox gene Pax6 or Six3 was co-expressed. These results indicate that Math3 and NeuroD are essential, but not sufficient, for amacrine cell genesis, and that co-expression of the basic helix-loop-helix and homeobox genes is required for specification of the correct neuronal subtype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Potential for neural regeneration after neurotoxic injury in the adult mammalian retina
Ooto, S., Akagi, T., Kageyama, R., Akita, J., Mandai, M., Honda, Y., & Takahashi, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402129101 · Cited by 454
Self-citationChen, D., Livne-bar, I., Vanderluit, J. L., Slack, R. S., Agochiya, M., & Bremner, R. (2004) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.05.025 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Inoue, T., Hojo, M., Bessho, Y., Tano, Y., Lee, J. E., & Kageyama, R.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-02-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 831-842
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2145147271
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.