The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An adjunct mammary epithelial cell population in parous females: its role in functional adaptation and tissue renewal
Abstract
Mammary gland biologists have long assumed that differentiated secretory epithelial cells undergo programmed cell death at the end of lactation and that the alveolar compartment is reconstituted from undifferentiated precursor cells in subsequent pregnancies. It is generally agreed that the remodeled gland in a parous animal resembles that of a mature virgin at the morphological level. However, several physiological differences have been noted in comparing the responses of mammary epithelia from nulliparous versus parous females to hormonal stimulation and carcinogenic agents. We present genetic evidence that an involuted mammary gland is fundamentally different from a virgin gland, despite its close morphological resemblance. This difference results from the formation of a new mammary epithelial cell population that originates from differentiating cells during pregnancy. In contrast to the majority of fully committed alveolar cells, this epithelial population does not undergo cell death during involution or remodeling after lactation. We show that these cells can function as alveolar progenitors in subsequent pregnancies and that they can play an important role in functional adaptation in genetically engineered mice, which exhibit a reversion of a lactation-deficient phenotype in multiparous animals. In transplantation studies, this parity-induced epithelial population shows the capacity for self-renewal and contributes significantly to the reconstitution of the resulting mammary outgrowth (i.e. ductal morphogenesis and lobulogenesis). We propose that this parity-induced population contributes importantly to the biological differences between the mammary glands of parous and nulliparous females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional interactions between Stat5 and the glucocorticoid receptor
Stöcklin, E., Wissler, M., Gouilleux, F., & Groner, B. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383726a0 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance
Van Keymeulen, A., Rocha, A. S., Ousset, M., Beck, B., Bouvencourt, G., Rock, J., Sharma, N., Dekoninck, S., & Blanpain, C. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10573 · Cited by 854
Breast cancer: origins and evolution
Polyak, K. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci33295 · Cited by 697
Molecular heterogeneity of breast carcinomas and the cancer stem cell hypothesis
Stingl, J., & Caldas, C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2212 · Cited by 470
Feng, Y., Manka, D., Wagner, K.-U., & Khan, S. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706933104 · Cited by 274
Self-citationAnatomy of the human mammary gland: Current status of knowledge
Hassiotou, F., & Geddes, D. (2013) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.22165 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, K.-U., Boulanger, C. A., Henry, M. D., Sgagias, M., Hennighausen, L., & Smith, G. H.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1377-1386
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2106626003
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An adjunct mammary epithelial cell population in parous females: its role in functional adaptation and tissue renewal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.129.6.1377
- The paper
- Wagner, K.-U., Boulanger, C. A., Henry, M. D., Sgagias, M., Hennighausen, L., & Smith, G. H. (2002). An adjunct mammary epithelial cell population in parous females: its role in functional adaptation and tissue renewal. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.6.1377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.