The Snail repressor positions Notch signaling in the Drosophila embryo
Abstract
The maternal Dorsal nuclear gradient initiates the differentiation of the mesoderm, neurogenic ectoderm and dorsal ectoderm in the precellular Drosophila embryo. Each tissue is subsequently subdivided into multiple cell types during gastrulation. We have investigated the formation of the mesectoderm within the ventral-most region of the neurogenic ectoderm. Previous studies suggest that the Dorsal gradient works in concert with Notch signaling to specify the mesectoderm through the activation of the regulatory gene sim within single lines of cells that straddle the presumptive mesoderm. This model was confirmed by misexpressing a constitutively activated form of the Notch receptor, Notch(IC), in transgenic embryos using the eve stripe2 enhancer. The Notch(IC) stripe induces ectopic expression of sim in the neurogenic ectoderm where there are low levels of the Dorsal gradient. sim is not activated in the ventral mesoderm, due to inhibition by the localized zinc-finger Snail repressor, which is selectively expressed in the ventral mesoderm. Additional studies suggest that the Snail repressor can also stimulate Notch signaling. A stripe2-snail transgene appears to induce Notch signaling in 'naïve' embryos that contain low uniform levels of Dorsal. We suggest that these dual activities of Snail, repression of Notch target genes and stimulation of Notch signaling, help define precise lines of sim expression within the neurogenic ectoderm.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is likely that Notch signaling is required for activation of sim and m8, which would explain their more refined expression domain.
“It is likely that Notch signaling is required for activation of sim and m8, which would explain their more refined expression domain”
From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Cowden and Levine 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Cowden, J., & Levine, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Levine, Michael
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1785-1793
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2183610572
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-46638)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
- Keywords
- Notch signaling, ventral mesoderm, Drosophila embryo, transcriptional repression, gastrulation, cell fate specification
- MeSH terms
- Snail Family Transcription Factors, Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Female, Genes, Regulator, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Genes, Insect, In Situ Hybridization, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, Receptors, Notch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review