Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effect of spatial arrangement on cell determination during mouse development

Hillman, N., Sherman, M. I., Graham, Chris·1972·Development

Abstract

The effect of cell position on cell determination was studied in mouse embryos. Embryos and parts of embryos were combined during early preimplantation development. The differentiation of cells in these composites was followed either by prelabelling some cells with tritiated thymidine or by combining cells which synthesized different electrophoretic variants of glucose phosphate isomerase. It was found that each blastomere of a 4-cell embryo could form both the trophoblast and the inner cell mass of the blastocyst. However, when blastomeres of a 4-cell embryo were placed on the outside of other 4-cell embryos then (a) they tended to form the outside layer of the blastocyst, (b) they tended to develop into the trophoblast and the yolk sac on the 10th day of pregnancy, (c) they tended not to form the coat colour of the foetus. Four-to eight-cell embryos which were completely surrounded by other blastomeres had lost the capacity to form vesicles at the blastocyst stage. We could find no evidence for the segregation of morphogenetic factors at the 4- and 8-cell stages of mouse development and concluded that at these stages cell position could determine the development of blastomeres.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.28.2.263

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hillman, N., Sherman, M. I., & Graham, C.
Venue
Development
Published
1972-10-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
263-278
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W1934769779
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.