The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The developmental capacity of nuclei transplanted from keratinized skin cells of adult frogs
Abstract
Nuclei from keratinized skin cells of adult Xenopus foot-webs have been transplanted to enucleated eggs of the same species. The cells used to provide donor nuclei were obtained as a monolayer outgrowth from cultured foot-web expiants. When explants were cultured without plasma for 3 days, over 99-9 % of the outgrowth cells contained keratin as revealed by the binding of monospecific fluorescent antibody prepared against purified Xenopus keratin. Nuclei were transplanted from cells which had been cultured for 3days. None of the first transfer embryos developed as far as tadpoles. Eleven clones of embryos were prepared from the nuclei of partial first-transfer blastulae by use of serial nuclear transplantation. Eight of these clones contained swimming tadpoles with functional muscle and nerve cells, and six clones contained tadpoles with beating hearts, well differentiated eyes, and other organs. To prove that the nuclei of nuclear-transplant tadpoles were derived from the transplanted skin cell nuclei and not from a failure of ultraviolet light to inactivate the recipient egg nucleus, 1-nu skin cell nuclei were transplanted to eggs laid by 2-nu frogs. Several advanced tadpoles from six clones were analysed for nucleolar and chromosome number and found to be 1-nu diploids. The six clones of advanced tadpoles which were proved to carry the donor nuclear marker represent six first-transfer nuclei in a total sample of 129 skin cell nuclei originally transplanted. The probability that all six nuclei were derived from the 01 % of the donor cell population not proved to contain keratin is less than one in 1010. We conclude that cell specialization does not involve any loss, irreversible inactivation or permanent change in chromosomal genes required for development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells
Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J., & Campbell, K. H. S. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385810a0 · Cited by 4,969
Resurrecting biodiversity: Advanced assisted reproductive technologies and biobanking
Bolton, R. L., Mooney, A., Pettit, M. T., Bolton, A. E., Morgan, L., Drake, G. J., Appeltant, R., Walker, S. L., Gillis, J. D., & Hvilsom, C. (2022) · Reproduction and Fertility · doi:10.1530/raf-22-0005 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurdon, J. B., Laskey, R. A., & Reeves, O. R.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1975-08-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-112
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2097236698
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.