Keeping Candida commensal: how lactobacilli antagonize pathogenicity of Candida albicans in an in vitro gut model
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT The intestine is the primary reservoir of Candida albicans that can cause systemic infections in immunocompromised patients. In this reservoir, the fungus exists as a harmless commensal. However, antibiotic treatment can disturb the bacterial microbiota, facilitating fungal overgrowth and favoring pathogenicity. The current in vitro gut models that are used to study the pathogenesis of C. albicans investigate the state in which C. albicans behaves as a pathogen rather than as a commensal. We present a novel in vitro gut model in which the fungal pathogenicity is reduced to a minimum by increasing the biological complexity. In this model, enterocytes represent the epithelial barrier and goblet cells limit C. albicans adhesion and invasion. Significant protection against C. albicans-induced necrotic damage was achieved by the introduction of a microbiota of antagonistic lactobacilli. We demonstrated a time-, dose- and species-dependent protective effect against C. albicans-induced cytotoxicity. This required bacterial growth, which relied on the presence of host cells, but was not dependent on the competition for adhesion sites. Lactobacillus rhamnosus reduced hyphal elongation, a key virulence attribute. Furthermore, bacterial-driven shedding of hyphae from the epithelial surface, associated with apoptotic epithelial cells, was identified as a main and novel mechanism of damage protection. However, host cell apoptosis was not the driving mechanism behind shedding. Collectively, we established an in vitro gut model that can be used to experimentally dissect commensal-like interactions of C. albicans with a bacterial microbiota and the host epithelial barrier. We also discovered fungal shedding as a novel mechanism by which bacteria contribute to the protection of epithelial surfaces. This article has an associated First Person interview with the joint first authors of the paper.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several previous studies have shown that probiotic Lactobacillus can inhibit the C. albicans adherence on the vaginal and intestinal mucosal surfaces.
“Regarding anti-Candida adhesion, several previous studies have also shown that probiotic Lactobacillus can inhibit the C. albicans adherence on the vaginal and intestinal mucosal surfaces.11, 12, 13, 14”
From Aggregation and adhesion ability of various probiotic strains and Candida species: An in vitro study (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction and Discussion report earlier studies in which lactobacilli inhibited C. albicans adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells. But the Results state that lactobacilli did not inhibit fungal adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells in this paper’s gut model, so the intestinal-adhesion part is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Graf, K., Last, A., Gratz, R., Allert, S., Linde, S., Westermann, M., Gröger, M., Mosig, A. S., Gresnigt, M. S., & Hube, B.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) (DE)
- Jena University Hospital (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hube, Bernhard
- ORCID
- Venue
- Disease Models & Mechanisms
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2019-09-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-8411
- PMC
- PMC6765188
- OpenAlex
- W2967862429
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Disease Models & Mechanisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 (812969, 812954)
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care (01EO1002)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EO1002, 031L0001A)
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- Candida albicans, lactobacilli, gut microbiota, in vitro gut model, epithelial barrier function, goblet cells, enterocytes, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, hyphal elongation, epithelial apoptosis, fungal virulence, antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, candidiasis
- MeSH terms
- Adhesiveness, Candida albicans, Cell Aggregation, Epithelium, Gene Expression Regulation, Glucose, Humans, Lactates, Lactobacillus, Models, Biological, Oxygen, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Species Specificity, Stress, Physiological, Time Factors, Apoptosis, Caco-2 Cells, Enterocytes, Hyphae, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbial Viability, Host-Pathogen Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review