The N-terminal region of malaria vaccine candidate asparagine-rich merozoite antigen is immunodominant and targeted by polyreactive antibodies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The development of malaria blood-stage vaccines has been hampered by sequence variation in many Plasmodium falciparum proteins involved in erythrocyte invasion. In the past few years, asparagine-rich merozoite antigen (PfARMA) has emerged as a potential vaccine candidate due to its low amino acid sequence diversity and the association between anti-PfARMA antibody levels and protection from malaria. Here, we used samples from P. falciparum-exposed individuals to study naturally acquired B cell and antibody responses to PfARMA. B cell responses to PfARMA were dominated by IgM+ B cells that recognized the N-terminal intrinsically disordered region 1 (IDR1) of PfARMA. A human monoclonal antibody (hmAb) to IDR1 was non-neutralizing, while a second hmAb binding to the folded domain showed weak neutralizing activity. Both PfARMA-specific plasma IgM and IgG responses predominately targeted IDR1, and their levels increased with P. falciparum exposure. However, in contrast to previous reports, these antibody responses did not correlate with protection in age- and exposure-matched children. Interestingly, approximately 30% of unexposed individuals had IgG that also targeted IDR1 and was polyreactive, binding to regions with high asparagine content. Finally, we determined that PfARMA is located in or near micronemes that contain erythrocyte binding antigen 175 (PfEBA-175). These data suggest that while IgG to the folded domain of PfARMA may inhibit parasite growth, antibody responses to PfARMA are primarily directed to IDR1. Consequently, these responses may reflect recent exposure rather than contributing to functional immunity to malaria.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Based on predictions of PfARMA structure by AlphaFold2 (Jumper et al., 2021) and the presence of disordered protein regions by IUPred2 (Mészáros et al., 2018; Erdo ̋ s and Dosztányi, 2020), the protein can be divided into three parts: intrinsically disordered region 1 (IDR1; amino acids 19 – 330), a folded domain (ami…”
Stanisic, D. I., Fowkes, F. J. I., Koinari, M., Javati, S., Lin, E., Kiniboro, B., Richards, J. S., Robinson, L. J., Schofield, L., Kazura, J. W., et al. (2015) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.02398-14 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Kapteyn, J., He, R., McDowell, E. T., & Gang, D. R. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-413 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Garza, R., Marchioni, J. M., Honeycutt, J. D., Hurlburt, N. K., Torres, C., Garcia, A., Neog, S., Loranc, E., Yemington, E., Towers, D., Ssewanyana, I., Pancera, M., Lavinder, J. J., Jagannathan, P., Greenhouse, B., Bol, S., & Bunnik, E. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (UG)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bunnik, Evelien M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Disease Models & Mechanisms
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-8411
- PMC
- PMC12709472
- OpenAlex
- W7161604019
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Disease Models & Mechanisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI153425, U19 AI089674, U19 AI150741)
- Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund
- National Institutes of Health (T32GM145432, F30 AI176697)
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood groups and transfusion
- Keywords
- malaria vaccine, intrinsically disordered regions, N-terminal domain, polyreactive antibodies, IgM+ B cells, IgG, neutralizing antibodies, micronemes, erythrocyte invasion, naturally acquired immunity, Plasmodium falciparum, blood-stage vaccine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review