A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast
Abstract
The Rad9 protein is a key adaptor protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint pathways. Its adaptor function is to link the activity of the Mec1 kinase to the activation of two parallel signalling pathways dependent on the Rad53 and Chk1 kinases. The mechanisms by which Rad9 interacts with, and activates, Rad53 are well understood. However, little was known about how Rad9 facilitates the activation of Chk1. We show here that the N-terminus of Rad9 is specifically important for phosphorylation and activation of the Chk1 kinase but not for the phosphorylation and activation of the Rad53 kinase. The Chk1 activation domain (CAD) of Rad9 is specifically important for signalling cell-cycle arrest after cdc13-1- and yku70Δ-induced telomere damage but not for tolerating ultraviolet-induced damage or inhibiting nuclease activity at telomeres. This work extends data showing that separable domains within the Rad9 adaptor protein allow it to activate two distinct kinase signalling pathways independently of each other.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chk1 activation also requires Rad9, but the mechanism by which Rad9 facilitates Chk1 phosphorylation by Mec1 is poorly understood.
“Chk1 activation also requires Rad9, but the mechanism through which this mediator facilitates Chk1 phosphorylation by Mec1 is still poorly understood [30].”
From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Blankley, R. T., & Lydall, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lydall, David
- ORCID
- Lydall, David
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 601-608
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2149114439
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Keywords
- Rad9, Chk1 activation, Rad53, DNA damage checkpoint, Mec1 kinase, adaptor proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomere damage, Yku70, cell cycle arrest, kinase phosphorylation, UV damage, nuclease activity
- MeSH terms
- Checkpoint Kinase 1, Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, DNA Damage, Enzyme Activation, Methyl Methanesulfonate, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Phenotype, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Signal Transduction, Sequence Alignment, Gene Deletion, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Cell Cycle Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review