Cited by 69DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast

Blankley, Richard T., Lydall, David·2004·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

The Rad9 protein is a key adaptor protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint pathways. Its adaptor function is to link the activity of the Mec1 kinase to the activation of two parallel signalling pathways dependent on the Rad53 and Chk1 kinases. The mechanisms by which Rad9 interacts with, and activates, Rad53 are well understood. However, little was known about how Rad9 facilitates the activation of Chk1. We show here that the N-terminus of Rad9 is specifically important for phosphorylation and activation of the Chk1 kinase but not for the phosphorylation and activation of the Rad53 kinase. The Chk1 activation domain (CAD) of Rad9 is specifically important for signalling cell-cycle arrest after cdc13-1- and yku70Δ-induced telomere damage but not for tolerating ultraviolet-induced damage or inhibiting nuclease activity at telomeres. This work extends data showing that separable domains within the Rad9 adaptor protein allow it to activate two distinct kinase signalling pathways independently of each other.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.00907

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chk1 activation also requires Rad9, but the mechanism by which Rad9 facilitates Chk1 phosphorylation by Mec1 is poorly understood.

    “Chk1 activation also requires Rad9, but the mechanism through which this mediator facilitates Chk1 phosphorylation by Mec1 is still poorly understood [30].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [30]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 69

Authors
Blankley, R. T., & Lydall, D.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Lydall, David
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
117
Issue
4
Pages
601-608
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2149114439
Cited by
69
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
Rad9, Chk1 activation, Rad53, DNA damage checkpoint, Mec1 kinase, adaptor proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomere damage, Yku70, cell cycle arrest, kinase phosphorylation, UV damage, nuclease activity
MeSH terms
Checkpoint Kinase 1, Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, DNA Damage, Enzyme Activation, Methyl Methanesulfonate, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Phenotype, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Signal Transduction, Sequence Alignment, Gene Deletion, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Cell Cycle Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review