Cited by 37DNA Repair MechanismsNuclear Structure and FunctionGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Spatial organization of nucleotide excision repair proteins after UV-induced DNA damage in the human cell nucleus

Solimando, Liliana, Luijsterburg, Martijn S., Vecchio, Lorella, Vermeulen, Wim, van Driel, Roel, Fakan, Stanislav·2009·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an evolutionary conserved DNA repair system that is essential for the removal of UV-induced DNA damage. In this study we investigated how NER is compartmentalized in the interphase nucleus of human cells at the ultrastructural level by using electron microscopy in combination with immunogold labeling. We analyzed the role of two nuclear compartments: condensed chromatin domains and the perichromatin region. The latter contains transcriptionally active and partly decondensed chromatin at the surface of condensed chromatin domains. We studied the distribution of the damage-recognition protein XPC and of XPA, which is a central component of the chromatin-associated NER complex. Both XPC and XPA rapidly accumulate in the perichromatin region after UV irradiation, whereas only XPC is also moderately enriched in condensed chromatin domains. These observations suggest that DNA damage is detected by XPC throughout condensed chromatin domains, whereas DNA-repair complexes seem preferentially assembled in the perichromatin region. We propose that UV-damaged DNA inside condensed chromatin domains is relocated to the perichromatin region, similar to what has been shown for DNA replication. In support of this, we provide evidence that UV-damaged chromatin domains undergo expansion, which might facilitate the translocation process. Our results offer novel insight into the dynamic spatial organization of DNA repair in the human cell nucleus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.031062

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 37

Authors
Solimando, L., Luijsterburg, M. S., Vecchio, L., Vermeulen, W., van Driel, R., & Fakan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 318, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
83-91
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2130373636
Cited by
37
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
nucleotide excision repair, UV-induced DNA damage, XPC, XPA, nuclear compartmentalization, chromatin decondensation, immunogold labeling
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Cell Nucleus, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, DNA Repair Enzymes, Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review