Cited by 92Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Lucky 13-microtubule depolymerisation by kinesin-13 motors

Moores, Carolyn A., Milligan, Ronald A.·2006·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

The kinesin-13 class of motors catalyses microtubule depolymerisation by bending tubulins at microtubule ends. Depolymerisation activity is intrinsic to the kinesin-13 motor core but the activity of the core alone is very low compared with that of constructs that also contain a conserved neck sequence. The full-length dimeric motor is an efficient depolymeriser and also diffuses along the microtubule lattice, which helps it to find microtubule ends. Current evidence supports the idea of a generic mechanism for kinesin-13-catalysed depolymerisation. However, the activity of kinesin-13 motors is precisely localised and regulated in vivo to enable a wide range of cellular roles. The proteins are involved in global control of microtubule dynamics. They also localise to mitotic and meiotic spindles, where they contribute to formation and maintenance of spindle bipolarity, chromosomal congression, attachment correction and chromatid separation. In interphase cells, intricate and subtle mechanisms appear to allow kinesin-13 motors to act on specific populations of microtubules. Such carefully controlled localisation and regulation makes these kinesins efficient, multi-tasking molecular motors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.03224

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 92

Authors
Moores, C. A., & Milligan, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
119
Issue
19
Pages
3905-3913
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2013110453
Cited by
92
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 52468)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
kinesin-13, microtubule depolymerization, microtubule dynamics, microtubule ends, mitotic spindle, meiotic spindle, spindle bipolarity, molecular motors
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cell Division, Humans, Interphase, Microtubules, Models, Biological, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Polymers, Protein Binding, Tubulin, Kinesins, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Dimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review