The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Redistribution and differential extraction of soluble proteins in permeabilized cultured cells Implications for immunofluorescence microscopy
Abstract
Immunofluorescence microscopy is widely used to characterize the cellular distribution of both soluble and structural proteins. Control experiments generally address only the specificity of the antibodies used. The permeabilization/fixation conditions used to prepare cells for antibody application are assumed to preserve faithfully the in vivo distibutions of the protein(s) being examined. We systematically tested the extent to which soluble proteins are redistributed into inappropriate locations and are differentially extracted from native locations during the permeabilization and fixation of the cells before antibody application. We separately introduce six soluble FITC-coiyugated proteins of different net charges and sizes into living cultured cells. The labeled proteins do not adhere to the external surfaces of living cells and are evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm with the larger proteins being excluded from the nucleus. The cells are then prepared as if for immunofluorescence using several conditions that encompass many of the methods commonly used for this purpose. Cells permeabilized with 0.1-0.2% Triton X100 before fixation with 3.7% paraformaldehyde show a striking localization of all but one of the test proteins to the nucleus and/or nucleoli of 60-80% of labeled cells. Punctate cytoplasmic labeling and cytoskeletal-like arrays of labeled protein are also observed. Extraction with 1% detergent prior to fixation removes most but not always all of the exogenous proteins from the cell remnants. Permeabilization of cells with 0.1% detergent after paraformaldehyde fixation leaves a reticular, uneven cytoplasmic distribution of the labeled proteins, and some of the larger proteins are redistributed to the nuclei. Direct fixation/permeabilization with −20°C methanol largely preserves the in vivo distributions of fluorescent proteins with some preferential localization of these proteins to nuclei, nucleoli and the perinuclear region. These results show that misleading apparent localizations of soluble proteins can result from their redistribution and/or differential extraction during the preparation of cells for primary antibody application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy
Waters, J. C. (2009) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200903097 · Cited by 613
Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging
Schnell, U., Dijk, F., Sjollema, K. A., & Giepmans, B. N. G. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1855 · Cited by 506
Stadler, C., Rexhepaj, E., Singan, V. R., Murphy, R. F., Pepperkok, R., Uhlén, M., Simpson, J. C., & Lundberg, E. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2377 · Cited by 265
Non-sarcomeric mode of myosin II organization in the fibroblast lamellum.
Verkhovsky, A. B., & Borisy, G. G. (1993) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.123.3.637 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Melan, M. A., & Sluder, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1992-04-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-743
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2463904825
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redistribution and differential extraction of soluble proteins in permeabilized cultured cells Implications for immunofluorescence microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.101.4.731
- The paper
- Melan, M. A., & Sluder, G. (1992). Redistribution and differential extraction of soluble proteins in permeabilized cultured cells Implications for immunofluorescence microscopy. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.101.4.731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.