The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immunological evidence that plants use both hdel and kdel for targeting proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum
Abstract
The epitopes of two monoclonal antibodies raised to a putative auxin receptor have been mapped. Carboxypeptidase A digestion of the antigen, auxin-binding protein (ABP) purified from maize, completely abolished binding of antibody MAC 256 and impaired binding of MAC 259, suggesting that they both recognise C-terminal epitopes. Published sequences of ABP showed that the C terminus was KDEL, a tetrapeptide used for targeting proteins to the ER in animal cells. We have used this short homology to confirm that the two monoclonals recognise C-terminal KDEL, showing that animal KDEL proteins and synthetic KDEL peptides are recognised and that animal cell ER is stained strongly and specifically. Sucrose density gradient fractionation of maize microsomal membranes showed that plant KDEL proteins, including ABP, fractionated with markers for the endoplasmic reticulum. However, few proteins are stained by anti-KDEL monoclonals in plants. For comparison, a monoclonal antibody raised to a synthetic HDEL peptide was also used and found to stain a set of proteins in all plant species tested. The anti-HDEL and anti-KDEL monoclonals were sequence specific, staining different proteins. On density gradient fractionation HDEL proteins also banded with ER marker activities. However, the intracellular distribution of HDEL and KDEL proteins determined by immunofluorescence was different. Whereas HDEL proteins showed a distribution characteristic of plant ER, and this localisation was confirmed by immunogold labelling of ultrathin sections and electron microscopy, KDEL proteins showed strong fluorescence in discrete parts of the cell cortex. These observations are discussed in terms of the potential these monoclonal antibodies have as markers for ER and of the role ABP plays in plant cell signalling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Baluška, F., Hlavacka, A., Šamaj, J., Palme, K., Robinson, D. G., Matoh, T., McCurdy, D. W., Menzel, D., & Volkmann, D. (2002) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.007526 · Cited by 265
van der Kaaij, A., van Noort, K., Nibbering, P., Wilbers, R. H. P., & Schots, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.882835 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Napier, R. M., Fowke, L. C., Hawes, C., Lewis, M., & Pelham, H. R. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-271
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W1897328392
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunological evidence that plants use both hdel and kdel for targeting proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.102.2.261
- The paper
- Napier, R. M., Fowke, L. C., Hawes, C., Lewis, M., & Pelham, H. R. B. (1992). Immunological evidence that plants use both hdel and kdel for targeting proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.102.2.261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.