The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage recruitment during limb development and wound healing in the embryonic and foetal mouse
Abstract
Macrophages play a pivotal role in the adult inflammatory response to wounding. They are directly responsible for cellular débridement and, by providing a source of growth factors and cytokines, they recruit other inflammatory and fibroblastic cells and influence cell proliferation and tissue remodelling. In this paper we investigate the role of macrophages in clearing areas of programmed cell death in the developing embryo and also their role in embryonic and foetal wound healing. Immunocytochemistry using the monocyte/macrophage-specific monoclonal antibody, F4/80, reveals a close association between areas of programmed cell death in the remodelling interdigital regions of the mouse footplate and of F4/80-positive cells, suggesting that monocyte-derived macrophages, and not locally recruited fibroblastic cells, as previously believed, are responsible for phagocytosing and clearing areas of interdigital apoptosis. Our studies of wound healing reveal that macrophages are not recruited to, and therefore cannot be playing an active role in the healing of, excisional wounds made in the mouse embryo at any stage up until E14.5. Beyond this transition stage we see a significant recruitment of macrophages within 12 hours of wounding. We find that macrophages can be attracted to wounds in earlier embryos if the wound results in significant cell death such as after burning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perry, V. H., Hume, D. A., & Gordon, S. (1985) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(85)90215-5 · Cited by 902
Self-citation
Cited by
Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation
Eming, S. A., Martin, P., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · Cited by 3,562
Self-citationInflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage
Koh, T. J., & DiPietro, L. A. (2011) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/s1462399411001943 · Cited by 1,667
Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly
Martin, P., & Leibovich, S. J. (2005) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2005.09.002 · Cited by 1,340
Self-citationTargeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities
McKercher, S. R., Torbett, B. E., Anderson, K. L., Henkel, G. W., Vestal, D. J., Baribault, H., Klemsz, M., Feeney, A. J., Wu, G. E., Paige, C. J., et al. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00949.x · Cited by 1,130
Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions
Jakubzick, C. V., Randolph, G. J., & Henson, P. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.28 · Cited by 910
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkinson-Woolley, J., Hughes, D., Gordon, S., & Martin, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1994-05-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1159-1167
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2403010988
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophage recruitment during limb development and wound healing in the embryonic and foetal mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.107.5.1159
- The paper
- Hopkinson-Woolley, J., Hughes, D., Gordon, S., & Martin, P. (1994). Macrophage recruitment during limb development and wound healing in the embryonic and foetal mouse. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.107.5.1159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.