The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for a myogenic stem cell that is exhausted in dystrophic muscle
Abstract
Injection of the myotoxin notexin, was found to induce regeneration in muscles that had been subjected to 18 Gy of radiation. This finding was unexpected as irradiation doses of this magnitude are known to block regeneration in dystrophic (mdx) mouse muscle. To investigate this phenomenon further we subjected mdx and normal (C57Bl/10) muscle to irradiation and notexin treatment and analysed them in two ways. First by counting the number of newly regenerated myofibres expressing developmental myosin in cryosections of damaged muscles. Second, by isolating single myofibres from treated muscles and counting the number of muscle precursor cells issuing from these over 2 day and 5 day periods. After irradiation neither normal nor dystrophic muscles regenerate to any significant extent. Moreover, single myofibres cultured from such muscles produce very few muscle precursor cells and these undergo little or no proliferation. However, when irradiated normal and mdx muscles were subsequently treated with notexin, regeneration was observed. In addition, some of the single myofibres produced rapidly proliferative muscle precursor cells when cultured. This occurred more frequently, and the myogenic cells proliferated more extensively, with fibres cultured from normal compared with dystrophic muscles. Even after 25 Gy, notexin induced some regeneration but no proliferative myogenic cells remained associated with the muscle fibres. Thus, skeletal muscles contain a number of functionally distinct populations of myogenic cells. Most are radiation sensitive. However, some survive 18 Gy as proliferative myogenic cells that can be evoked by extreme conditions of muscle damage; this population is markedly diminished in muscles of the mdx mouse. A small third population survives 25 Gy and forms muscle but not proliferative myogenic cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Myogenic satellite cells: physiology to molecular biology
Hawke, T. J., & Garry, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.2.534 · Cited by 1,644
Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture
Gilbert, P. M., Havenstrite, K. L., Magnusson, K. E. G., Sacco, A., Leonardi, N. A., Kraft, P., Nguyen, N. K., Thrun, S., Lutolf, M. P., & Blau, H. M. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1191035 · Cited by 1,587
Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle
Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044 · Cited by 1,449
Collins, C. A., Olsen, I., Zammit, P. S., Heslop, L., Petrie, A., Partridge, T. A., & Morgan, J. E. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.010 · Cited by 1,445
Self-citationExpression of Cd34 and Myf5 Defines the Majority of Quiescent Adult Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells
Beauchamp, J. R., Heslop, L., Yu, D. S. W., Tajbakhsh, S., Kelly, R. G., Wernig, A., Buckingham, M. E., Partridge, T. A., & Zammit, P. S. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.6.1221 · Cited by 916
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heslop, L., Morgan, J. E., & Partridge, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-06-15
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2299-2308
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2281133656
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for a myogenic stem cell that is exhausted in dystrophic muscle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.113.12.2299
- The paper
- Heslop, L., Morgan, J. E., & Partridge, T. A. (2000). Evidence for a myogenic stem cell that is exhausted in dystrophic muscle. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.113.12.2299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.