Cited by 11

Reinterpreting the effects of α-tubulin K40 acetylation on microtubule stability and cellular functions

Lu, Yu-Ming·2025·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

Acetylation of α-tubulin at lysine 40 (K40) has been studied in many model organisms for decades, mainly by manipulating levels of deacetylase and acetyltransferase enzymes, such as the α-tubulin acetyltransferase MEC-17 (also known as ATAT1). Observations that acetylation accumulates in some long-lived microtubules and that MEC-17 is important for maintaining microtubule organization and key cellular functions have led to the prevailing view that K40 acetylation stabilizes and protects microtubules, although many questions about its precise function remain. Recent gene editing of endogenous α-tubulin and in vitro microtubule polymerization assays have indicated that K40 acetylation itself does not maintain microtubule structure as MEC-17 does, but rather negatively regulates specific aspects of microtubule dynamics (i.e. nucleation and shrinkage but not elongation) and slightly impairs neuronal extension. This Opinion article discusses multiple important studies on α-tubulin K40 acetylation that have shaped our understanding of its function since its discovery in the 1980s, with the aim of clarifying the actual role of this major tubulin post-translational modification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.263431

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Y.-M.
Affiliations
Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet 1 , 171 77 Stockholm ,
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2025-07-15
Volume
138
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 0021-9533
  • 1477-9137
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review