Upper thermal tolerance and oxygen limitation in terrestrial arthropods
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The hypothesis of oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance proposes that critical temperatures are set by a transition to anaerobic metabolism, and that upper and lower tolerances are therefore coupled. Moreover, this hypothesis has been dubbed a unifying general principle and extended from marine to terrestrial ectotherms. By contrast, in insects the upper and lower limits are decoupled, suggesting that the oxygen limitation hypothesis might not be as general as proposed. However, no direct tests of this hypothesis or its predictions have been undertaken in terrestrial species. We use a terrestrial isopod (Armadillidium vulgare) and a tenebrionid beetle(Gonocephalum simplex) to test the prediction that thermal tolerance should vary with oxygen partial pressure. Whilst in the isopod critical thermal maximum declined with declining oxygen concentration, this was not the case in the beetle. Efficient oxygen delivery via a tracheal system makes oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance, at a whole organism level,unlikely in insects. By contrast, oxygen limitation of thermal tolerances is expected to apply to species, like the isopod, in which the circulatory system contributes significantly to oxygen delivery. Because insects dominate terrestrial systems, oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance cannot be considered pervasive in this habitat, although it is a characteristic of marine species.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Klok, C. J., Sinclair, B. J., & Chown, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Chown, Steven L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2361-2370
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2108260661
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-5245601)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Keywords
- upper thermal tolerance, oxygen limitation, heat tolerance, critical thermal maximum, critical thermal minimum, anaerobic metabolism, terrestrial arthropods, terrestrial isopods, Armadillidium vulgare, Tenebrionidae, oxygen partial pressure, tracheal system, oxygen delivery, cardiovascular system, ectotherms, insects
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Coleoptera, Carbon Dioxide, Environment, Motor Activity, Oxygen, Partial Pressure, South Africa, Species Specificity, Temperature, Isopoda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review