When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight
Open accessAbstract
We have used computational fluid dynamics to study changes in lift generation and vortex dynamics for Reynolds numbers (Re) between 8 and 128. The immersed boundary method was used to model a two-dimensional wing through one stroke cycle. We calculated lift and drag coefficients as a function of time and related changes in lift to the shedding or attachment of the leading and trailing edge vortices. We find that the fluid dynamics around the wing fall into two distinct patterns. For Re> or =64, leading and trailing edge vortices are alternately shed behind the wing, forming the von Karman vortex street. For Re< or =32, the leading and trailing edge vortices remain attached to the wing during each 'half stroke'. In three-dimensional studies, large lift forces are produced by 'vortical asymmetry' when the leading edge vortex remains attached to the wing for the duration of each half stroke and the trailing edge vortex is shed. Our two-dimensional study suggests that this asymmetry is lost for Re below some critical value (between 32 and 64), resulting in lower lift forces. We suggest that this transition in fluid dynamics is significant for lift generation in tiny insects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The immersed boundary method has been applied to a wide variety of problems in biological fluid dynamics for intermediate Re including insect flight, aquatic locomotion, and ciliary driven flows.
“The immersed boundary method has been applied to a wide variety of problems in biological fluid dynamics for intermediate Re including insect flight [26, 27, 28], aquatic locomotion [16, 15], and ciliary driven flows [18].”
From Reynolds number limits for jet propulsion: a numerical study of simplified jellyfish (2011) · cites this paper as [26]
Flapping flight does not occur for Re < 5.
“flapping flight does not occur for Re < 5 [26].”
From Reynolds number limits for jet propulsion: a numerical study of simplified jellyfish (2011) · cites this paper as [26]
The Abstract (page unavailable) describes simulations at Re 8–128 and predicts lower lift below a transition between Re 32 and 64. The Discussion (page unavailable) mentions a separate thrust-production transition between Re 5 and 20, but neither passage says that flapping flight does not occur below Re 5. Searched for that threshold and for a minimum Reynolds number for flapping flight. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 169
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. (1959). Fluid Mechanics. London: Pergamon Press.
- H. G. Othmer, F. R. Adler, M. A. Lewis and J. C. Dallon), pp. 309-337. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- Authors
- Miller, L. A., & Peskin, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Laura A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3073-3088
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2035582186
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9980069)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
- Keywords
- insect flight, lift generation, vortex dynamics, leading-edge vortex, trailing edge vortex, Karman vortex street, Reynolds number effects, lift and drag coefficients
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Biophysics, Flight, Animal, Insecta, Models, Biological, Time Factors, Wings, Animal, Biophysical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review