The numerical comparison of flow patterns and propulsive performances for the hydromedusae Sarsia tubulosa and Aequorea victoria
Abstract
The thrust-generating mechanism of a prolate hydromedusa Sarsia tubulosa and an oblate hydromedusa Aequorea victoria was investigated by solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in the swirl-free cylindrical coordinates. The calculations clearly show the vortex dynamics related to the thrust-generating mechanism, which is very important for understanding the underlying propulsion mechanism. The calculations for the prolate jetting hydromedusa S. tubulosa indicate the formation of a single starting vortex ring for each pulse cycle with a relatively high vortex formation number. However, the calculations for the oblate jet-paddling hydromedusa A. victoria indicate shedding of the opposite-signed vortex rings very close to each other and the formation of large induced velocities along the line of interaction as the vortices move away from the hydromedusa in the wake. In addition to this jet propulsion mechanism, the hydromedusa's bell margin acts like a paddle and the highly flexible bell margin deforms in such a way that the low pressure leeward side of the bell margin has a projected area in the direction of motion. This thrust is particularly important during refilling of the subumbrella cavity where the stopping vortex causes significant pressure drag. The swimming performances based on our numerical simulations, such as swimming velocity, thrust, power requirement and efficiency, were computed and support the idea that jet propulsion is very effective for rapid body movement but is energetically costly and less efficient compared with the jet-paddling propulsion mechanism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The work here is not a substitute for the careful modeling of specific animals.
“the work here is not a substitute for the careful modeling of specific animals such as the work of [29, 34, 23].”
From Reynolds number limits for jet propulsion: a numerical study of simplified jellyfish (2011) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Sahin, M., Mohseni, K., & Colin, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder,CO 80309, USA
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Roger Williams University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2009-08-15
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2656-2667
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2039865024
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
- Keywords
- hydromedusae, Sarsia tubulosa, Aequorea victoria, jet propulsion, vortex dynamics, starting vortex, thrust generation, swimming performance, energy efficiency, flow patterns
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Mouth, Movement, Muscles, Rheology, Swimming, Computational Biology, Hydrozoa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review