The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: We carry out fluid–structure interaction simulations of self-propelled virtual swimmers to investigate the effects of body shape (form) and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of undulatory swimming. To separate the effects of form and kinematics, we employ four different virtual swimmers: a carangiform swimmer (i.e. a mackerel swimming like mackerel do in nature); an anguilliform swimmer (i.e. a lamprey swimming like lampreys do in nature); a hybrid swimmer with anguilliform kinematics but carangiform body shape (a mackerel swimming like a lamprey); and another hybrid swimmer with carangiform kinematics but anguilliform body shape (a lamprey swimming like a mackerel). By comparing the performance of swimmers with different kinematics but similar body shapes we study the effects of kinematics whereas by comparing swimmers with similar kinematics but different body shapes we study the effects of form. We show that the anguilliform kinematics not only reaches higher velocities but is also more efficient in the viscous (Re∼102) and transitional (Re∼103) regimes. However, in the inertial regime (Re=∞) carangiform kinematics achieves higher velocities and is also more efficient than the anguilliform kinematics. The mackerel body achieves higher swimming speeds in all cases but is more efficient in the inertial regime only whereas the lamprey body is more efficient in the transitional regime. We also show that form and kinematics have little overall effect on the 3-D structure of the wake (i.e. single vs double row vortex streets), which mainly depends on the Strouhal number. Nevertheless, body shape is found to somewhat affect the small-scale features and complexity of the vortex rings shed by the various swimmers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Passive propulsion in vortex wakes
BEAL, D. N., HOVER, F. S., TRIANTAFYLLOU, M. S., LIAO, J. C., & LAUDER, G. V. (2006) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112005007925 · Cited by 421
Flow patterns of larval fish: undulatory swimming in the intermediate flow regime
Müller, U. K., van den Boogaart, J. G. M., & van Leeuwen, J. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.005629 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid–structure interaction
Sotiropoulos, F., & Yang, X. (2014) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.09.003 · Cited by 473
Self-citationTytell, E. D., Hsu, C.-Y., Williams, T. L., Cohen, A. H., & Fauci, L. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1011564107 · Cited by 300
Synchronisation through learning for two self-propelled swimmers
Novati, G., Verma, S., Alexeev, D., Rossinelli, D., van Rees, W. M., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2017) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/aa6311 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Volume
- 213
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-107
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2156997338
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.030932
- The paper
- Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2010). On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.030932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.