Combining sky and Earth: Desert ants (Melophorus bagoti) show weighted integration of celestial and terrestrial cues
Open accessAbstract
Insects typically use celestial sources of directional information for path integration, and terrestrial panoramic information for view-based navigation. Here we set celestial and terrestrial sources of directional information in conflict for homing desert ants (Melophorus bagoti). In Experiment 1, ants learned to navigate out of a round experimental arena with a distinctive artificial panorama. On crucial tests, we rotated the arena to create a conflict between the artificial panorama and celestial information. In Experiment 2, ants at a feeder in their natural visually-cluttered habitat were displaced prior to their homing journey so that the dictates of path integration (feeder-nest direction) based on a celestial compass conflicted with the dictates of view-based navigation (release point-nest direction) based on the natural terrestrial panorama. In both experiments, ants generally headed in a direction intermediate to the dictates of celestial and terrestrial information. In Experiment 2, the ants put more weight on the terrestrial cues when they provided better directional information. We conclude that desert ants weight and integrate the dictates of celestial and terrestrial information in determining their initial heading, even when the two directional cues are highly discrepant.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Navigating animals assign more weight to spatial cues that are more salient or more stable and familiar; this is true in both insects and vertebrates.
“For example, navigating animals assign more weight to spatial cues that are more salient or more stable and familiar; this is true in both insects8–13 and vertebrates3–7,14.”
From Multimodal cue integration and learning in a neural representation of head direction (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links.
Deneve, S., & Pouget, A. (2004) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Desert ants compensate for navigation uncertainty
Wolf, H., & Wehner, R. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01905 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular Statistics in Biology. New York, NY; London: Academic Press.
- Narendra, A., Gourmaud, S. and Zeil, J. (2013). Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20130683.
- Sommer, S., von Beeren, C. and Wehner, R. (2008). Multiroute memories in desert ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 317-322.
- Wehner, R. (1997). The ant's celestial compass system: spectral and polarization channels. In Orientation and Communication in Arthropods (ed. M. Lehrer), pp. 145- 185. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
- Wehner, R. and Müller, M. (2006). The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant's celestial system of navigation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12575-12579.
- Wehner, R. and Srinivasan, M. V. (2003). Path integration in insects. In The Neurobiology of Spatial Behaviour (ed. K. J. Jeffery), pp. 9-30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wystrach, A., Schwarz, S., Baniel, A. and Cheng, K. (2013). Backtracking behaviour in lost ants: an additional strategy in their navigational toolkit. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20131677.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimal multiguidance integration in insect navigation
Hoinville, T., & Wehner, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1721668115 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
A decentralised neural model explaining optimal integration of navigational strategies in insects
Sun, X., Yue, S., & Mangan, M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54026 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Multimodal cue integration and learning in a neural representation of head direction
Basnak, M. A., Kutschireiter, A., Okubo, T. S., Chen, A., Gorelik, P., Drugowitsch, J., & Wilson, R. I. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01823-z · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Khaldy, L., Foster, J. J., Yilmaz, A., Belušič, G., Gagnon, Y., Tocco, C., Byrne, M. J., & Dacke, M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.243734 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Weighted cue integration for straight-line orientation
Shaverdian, S., Dirlik, E., Mitchell, R., Tocco, C., Webb, B., & Dacke, M. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105207 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Khaldy, L., Tocco, C., Byrne, M., & Dacke, M. (2021) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects12060526 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Legge, E. L. G., Wystrach, A., Spetch, M. L., & Cheng, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Legge, Eric L. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- Pt 23
- Pages
- 4159-66
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2044736816
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Macquarie University
- Fondation Fyssen
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (38861)
- Australian Research Council (DP110100608, DP0770300)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Keywords
- desert ants, Melophorus bagoti, celestial cues, weighted integration, homing behavior, path integration, view-based navigation, insect navigation, cue conflict
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Ants, Cues, Desert Climate, Homing Behavior, Orientation, Space Perception, Solar System, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review