Cited by 169Muscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

Muscle memory and a new cellular model for muscle atrophy and hypertrophy

Gundersen, Kristian·2016·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Memory is a process in which information is encoded, stored, and retrieved. For vertebrates, the modern view has been that it occurs only in the brain. This review describes a cellular memory in skeletal muscle in which hypertrophy is 'remembered' such that a fibre that has previously been large, but subsequently lost its mass, can regain mass faster than naive fibres. A new cell biological model based on the literature, with the most reliable methods for identifying myonuclei, can explain this phenomenon. According to this model, previously untrained fibres recruit myonuclei from activated satellite cells before hypertrophic growth. Even if subsequently subjected to grave atrophy, the higher number of myonuclei is retained, and the myonuclei seem to be protected against the elevated apoptotic activity observed in atrophying muscle tissue. Fibres that have acquired a higher number of myonuclei grow faster when subjected to overload exercise, thus the nuclei represent a functionally important 'memory' of previous strength. This memory might be very long lasting in humans, as myonuclei are stable for at least 15 years and might even be permanent. However, myonuclei are harder to recruit in the elderly, and if the long-lasting muscle memory also exists in humans, one should consider early strength training as a public health advice. In addition, myonuclei are recruited during steroid use and encode a muscle memory, at least in rodents. Thus, extending the exclusion time for doping offenders should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.124495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Until clinical therapies restore mechanosensitivity of the senescent nucleolus and re-ignite Pol I transcription, treatments aimed solely at spiking mTORC1 efficiency will continue to fall short in reversing sarcopenia.

    “Until clinical therapies can successfully restore the mechanosensitivity of the senescent nucleolus and re-ignite Pol I transcription, treatments aimed solely at spiking mTORC1 efficiency will continue to fall short in reversing sarcopenia [111,112].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 113 · Cited by 169

Authors
Gundersen, K.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Gundersen, Kristian
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
219
Issue
2
Pages
235-242
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2306577147
Cited by
169
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Keywords
muscle memory, skeletal muscle hypertrophy, muscle atrophy, myonuclei, satellite cells, cellular memory, apoptosis, resistance training, aging, anabolic steroids, doping
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Hypertrophy, Models, Biological, Muscular Atrophy, Public Health, Sports, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review