Muscle memory and a new cellular model for muscle atrophy and hypertrophy
Abstract
Memory is a process in which information is encoded, stored, and retrieved. For vertebrates, the modern view has been that it occurs only in the brain. This review describes a cellular memory in skeletal muscle in which hypertrophy is 'remembered' such that a fibre that has previously been large, but subsequently lost its mass, can regain mass faster than naive fibres. A new cell biological model based on the literature, with the most reliable methods for identifying myonuclei, can explain this phenomenon. According to this model, previously untrained fibres recruit myonuclei from activated satellite cells before hypertrophic growth. Even if subsequently subjected to grave atrophy, the higher number of myonuclei is retained, and the myonuclei seem to be protected against the elevated apoptotic activity observed in atrophying muscle tissue. Fibres that have acquired a higher number of myonuclei grow faster when subjected to overload exercise, thus the nuclei represent a functionally important 'memory' of previous strength. This memory might be very long lasting in humans, as myonuclei are stable for at least 15 years and might even be permanent. However, myonuclei are harder to recruit in the elderly, and if the long-lasting muscle memory also exists in humans, one should consider early strength training as a public health advice. In addition, myonuclei are recruited during steroid use and encode a muscle memory, at least in rodents. Thus, extending the exclusion time for doping offenders should be considered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Until clinical therapies restore mechanosensitivity of the senescent nucleolus and re-ignite Pol I transcription, treatments aimed solely at spiking mTORC1 efficiency will continue to fall short in reversing sarcopenia.
“Until clinical therapies can successfully restore the mechanosensitivity of the senescent nucleolus and re-ignite Pol I transcription, treatments aimed solely at spiking mTORC1 efficiency will continue to fall short in reversing sarcopenia [111,112].”
From Ribosome Biogenesis as a Putative Bottleneck to Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Mechanisms, Human Evidence, and Practical Modulators (2026) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Gundersen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Gundersen, Kristian
- ORCID
- Gundersen, Kristian
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-242
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2306577147
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
- Keywords
- muscle memory, skeletal muscle hypertrophy, muscle atrophy, myonuclei, satellite cells, cellular memory, apoptosis, resistance training, aging, anabolic steroids, doping
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Hypertrophy, Models, Biological, Muscular Atrophy, Public Health, Sports, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review