Colour vision of the foraging swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that foraging summer-form females of the Japanese yellow swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus have colour vision. The butterflies were trained to feed on sucrose solution placed on a disk of a particular colour in a cage set in the laboratory. After a few such training runs, a butterfly was presented with the training colour randomly positioned within an array of disks of other colours, but with no sucrose solution. The results indicate that the butterflies learn rapidly to select the training colour reliably among different colours. The training colour was also correctly selected when it was covered with neutral density filters to reduce its brightness, or even when the colour was presented together with disks of a variety of shades of grey. These results demonstrate convincingly, for the first time, that a butterfly has true colour vision.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is some evidence that butterflies can have flexible color preference depending on the environmental context of the display.
“there is some evidence that butterflies can have flexible color preference depending on the environmental context of the display”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Kinoshita et al., 1999
Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers.
“Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers (Kelber & Pfaff, 1997; Kinoshita et al., 1999; Weiss, 1997; Weiss & Papaj, 2003).”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Kinoshita et al., 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio
Arikawa, K. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0454-7 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins
Briscoe, A. D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.013045 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kinoshita, M., Shimada, N., & Arikawa, K.
- Affiliations
- Yokohama City University (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-01-15
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-102
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W1918141379
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- Papilio xuthus, foraging behavior, color learning, sucrose reward, color discrimination, brightness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review