Cited by 141Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Colour vision of the foraging swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus

Kinoshita, Michiyo, Shimada, Naoko, Arikawa, Kentaro·1999·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that foraging summer-form females of the Japanese yellow swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus have colour vision. The butterflies were trained to feed on sucrose solution placed on a disk of a particular colour in a cage set in the laboratory. After a few such training runs, a butterfly was presented with the training colour randomly positioned within an array of disks of other colours, but with no sucrose solution. The results indicate that the butterflies learn rapidly to select the training colour reliably among different colours. The training colour was also correctly selected when it was covered with neutral density filters to reduce its brightness, or even when the colour was presented together with disks of a variety of shades of grey. These results demonstrate convincingly, for the first time, that a butterfly has true colour vision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.202.2.95

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that butterflies can have flexible color preference depending on the environmental context of the display.

    “there is some evidence that butterflies can have flexible color preference depending on the environmental context of the display”

    From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Kinoshita et al., 1999

  • Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers.

    “Much of what we have learned about color preference in butterflies comes from laboratory studies, often explored through the use of artificial flowers (Kelber & Pfaff, 1997; Kinoshita et al., 1999; Weiss, 1997; Weiss & Papaj, 2003).”

    From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Kinoshita et al., 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinoshita, M., Shimada, N., & Arikawa, K.
Affiliations
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1999-01-15
Volume
202
Issue
2
Pages
95-102
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W1918141379
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
Papilio xuthus, foraging behavior, color learning, sucrose reward, color discrimination, brightness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review