Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Co-Ordination of Insect Movements

Hughes, G. M.·1952·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Though walking forms part of many insect behaviour patterns, the mechanism of insect walking has received relatively little attention in recent years. As a preliminary to a later investigation of neuromuscular co-ordination in insects, the normal pattern of walking movements in the cockroach and other insects has been studied. The results obtained and an account of the functional anatomy of the insect leg are given in this paper. The forces involved have not been measured, but a preliminary analysis of the mechanics of walking has been made with the help of ‘stills’ from cinematographic films. The use of cinematography greatly facilitates such an investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.29.2.267

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1952-06-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
267-285
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2343990245
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Co-Ordination of Insect Movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.29.2.267
The paper
Hughes, G. M. (1952). The Co-Ordination of Insect Movements. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.29.2.267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.