The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power Requirements for Horizontal Flight in the Pigeon Columba Livia
Abstract
Certain measurements made on pigeons flying horizontally in a wind-tunnel are described. A method, based on helicopter theory, for calculating the power required to fly at any given speed is explained. Induced, profile and parasite power are calculated separately. It is concluded that the pigeon can fly horizontally without incurring an oxygen debt at speeds from 3 to 16 m./sec. The minimum power speed is 8 – 9 m./sec. The maximum continuous power output is estimated to be 10·5 W., and the corresponding oxygen consumption about 170 ml./min. The maximum (sprint) power is estimated to be 20·4 W., from observations of vertical climb after take-off. The estimated best lift: drag ratio in horizontal flight is 5·9, giving a range of 11·8 km./g. of fat oxidized for a 400 g. pigeon. It is argued from considerations of structural strength that the early part of the downstroke is used mainly to impart angular velocity to the wing, and that air loads are only developed after most of the angular acceleration has taken place. The tension in the pectoralis insertion may exceed 60% of the breaking tension in fast horizontal flight. The power calculation was repeated for the ruby-throated hummingbird, using published data. Estimated best range is about 900 km./g. of fat oxidized, achieved at 9 m./sec. The corresponding effective lift: drag ratio is 4 ·1. The variation of power required and power available with size is considered, and the effect on hovering and take-off performance of different birds deduced. Performance estimates for the pigeon and ruby-throated hummingbird are very poor by engineering standards, but consistent with these birds’ known abilities, and are in general agreement with estimates of effective lift: drag ratio derived from published data on other species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds
Lasiewski, R. C., & Dawson, W. R. (1967) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1366368 · Cited by 816
Cited by
Weis-Fogh, T. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.59.1.169 · Cited by 1,371
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Self-citationWALKING ON WATER: Biolocomotion at the Interface
Bush, J. W. M., & Hu, D. L. (2006) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092157 · Cited by 573
THE MECHANICS OF BIRD MIGRATION
Pennycuick, C. J. (1969) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1969.tb02566.x · Cited by 386
Self-citationANDERSSON, M., & NORBERG, R. Å. (1981) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb00752.x · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennycuick, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1968-12-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 527-555
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2102248143
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power Requirements for Horizontal Flight in the Pigeon Columba Livia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.49.3.527
- The paper
- Pennycuick, C. J. (1968). Power Requirements for Horizontal Flight in the Pigeon Columba Livia. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.49.3.527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.