The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Suction Feeding Mechanism in Sunfishes (Lepomis): An Experimental Analysis
Abstract
The process of prey capture by inertial suction was studied in three species of sunfishes (Lepomis auritus, L. macrochirus, and L. gibbosus) by the simultaneous recording of buccal and opercular cavity pressures in order to test current hydrodynamic models of feeding in fishes. Synchronous high-speed films permitted the correlation of kinematic patterns of jaw bone movement with specific pressure waveforms. Opercular cavity pressures averaged one-fifth buccal pressures and pressure magnitude was correlated with prey type. Peak buccal and opercular pressures were — 650 cm H2O and — 150 cm H2O respectively; peak rate of pressure change was — 100 cm H2O/ms. Buccal pressure magnitude varied inversely with degree of predator satiation. Opercular pressure waveforms have an initial positive phase followed by a prolonged negative phase and then a final positive phase. The initial positive pressure may be absent during slow strikes at worms. Buccal pressure waveforms show considerable variability. The modal waveform consists of a sharp negative pressure pulse followed by a positive phase and finally by another pressure reduction. Delayed opercular abduction relative to mouth cavity compression correlates with the presence of a positive buccal phase. The second buccal negative pressure is the result of rapid mouth closing causing a pressure reduction (water hammer effect) as water flow continues posteriorly. These data indicate that (1) the buccal and opercular cavities are functionally separated by a gill curtain of high resistance, (2) that inertial effects of water are important in the description of the suction feeding process, (3) that a reverse flow of water (opercular to buccal cavity) may occur during the early phase of mouth opening prior to establishment of a buccal to opercular flow regime, and (4) current models of respiratory pressure and flow pattern cannot be applied to feeding. Current hydrodynamic models of suction feeding in fishes are re-evaluated in the light of this analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts
Lazzaro, X. (1987) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00008764 · Cited by 565
Prey capture by larval zebrafish: evidence for fine axial motor control
Borla, M. A., Palecek, B., Budick, S., & O’Malley, D. M. (2002) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000066699 · Cited by 180
Pursuit and Evasion Strategies in the Predator–Prey Interactions of Fishes
Peterson, A. N., Soto, A. P., & McHenry, M. J. (2021) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icab116 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauder, G. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1980-10-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-72
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2162447131
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Suction Feeding Mechanism in Sunfishes (Lepomis): An Experimental Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.88.1.49
- The paper
- Lauder, G. V. (1980). The Suction Feeding Mechanism in Sunfishes (Lepomis): An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.88.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.