The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of rapid manufacturing—using layer manufacturing processes for production
Open accessAbstract
Rapid prototyping (RP) technologies that have emerged over the last 15 years are all based on the principle of creating three-dimensional geometries directly from computer aided design (CAD) by stacking two-dimensional profiles on top of each other. To date most RP parts are used for prototyping or tooling purposes; however, in future the majority may be produced as end-use products. The term ‘rapid manufacturing’ in this context uses RP technologies as processes for the production of end-use products. This paper reports findings from a cost analysis that was performed to compare a traditional manufacturing route (injection moulding) with layer manufacturing processes (stereolithography, fused deposition modelling and laser sintering) in terms of the unit cost for parts made in various quantities. The results show that, for some geometries, it is more economical to use layer manufacturing methods than it is to use traditional approaches for production in the thousands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers
Goodridge, R. D., Tuck, C. J., & Hague, R. J. M. (2012) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.001 · Cited by 835
The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push
Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., & Hague, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015 · Cited by 658
Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: A review
Gisario, A., Kazarian, M., Martina, F., & Mehrpouya, M. (2019) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.005 · Cited by 574
Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Jiang, J., Xu, X., & Stringer, J. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp2040064 · Cited by 527
A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job
Pereira, T., Kennedy, J. V., & Potgieter, J. (2019) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkinson, N., & Dicknes, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-39
- ISSN
- 0263-7154 (ISSN-L)
- 0954-4062
- 2041-2983
- OpenAlex
- W2073562379
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of rapid manufacturing—using layer manufacturing processes for production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1243/095440603762554596
- The paper
- Hopkinson, N., & Dicknes, P. (2003). Analysis of rapid manufacturing—using layer manufacturing processes for production. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440603762554596
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.