Multiparametric MRI and Whole Slide Image-Based Pretreatment Prediction of Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Radiopathomic Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: The aim of this work is to combine radiological and pathological information of tumor to develop a signature for pretreatment prediction of discrepancies of pathological response at several centers and restage patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for individualized treatment planning. Patients and Methods: A total of 981 consecutive patients with evaluation of response according to tumor regression grade (TRG) who received nCRT were retrospectively recruited from four hospitals (primary cohort and external validation cohort 1–3); both pretreatment multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) and whole slide image (WSI) of biopsy specimens were available for each patient. Quantitative image features were extracted from mp-MRI and WSI and used to construct a radiopathomics signature (RPS) powered by an artificial-intelligence model. Models based on mp-MRI or WSI alone were also constructed for comparison. Results: The RPS showed overall accuracy of 79.66–87.66% in validation cohorts. The areas under the curve of RPS at specific response grades were 0.98 (TRG0), 0.93 (≤ TRG1), and 0.84 (≤ TRG2). RPS at each grade of pathological response revealed significant improvement compared with both signatures constructed without combining multiscale tumor information (P < 0.01). Moreover, RPS showed relevance to distinct probabilities of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with LARC who underwent nCRT (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that radiopathomics, combining both radiological information of the whole tumor and pathological information of local lesions from biopsy, could potentially predict discrepancies of pathological response prior to nCRT for better treatment planning.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration of MRI radiomics and WSI enhances NAC response prediction in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
“In recent studies, researchers confirmed that the integration of MRI radiomics and WSI enhances NAC response prediction in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (17, 18).”
From A multimodal and fully automated system for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The Discussion reports that combining MRI and WSI significantly improved pretreatment prediction of pathological response compared with either alone. But the Patients and Methods section specifies that the patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and that those receiving chemotherapy alone were excluded; it does not establish improved prediction of response to NAC alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Shao, L., Liu, Z., Feng, L., Lou, X., Li, Z., Zhang, X.-Y., Wan, X., Zhou, X., Sun, K., Zhang, D.-F., Wu, L., Yang, G., Sun, Y.-S., Xu, R., Fan, X., & Tian, J.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Kunming Medical University (CN)
- Xidian University (CN)
- Southeast University (CN)
- Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Fan, Xinjuan
- Tian, Jie
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Published
- 2020-07-29
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4296-4306
- ISSN
- 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-4681
- PMC
- PMC7497677
- OpenAlex
- W3045639672
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annals of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-JSC005, KFJ-STS-ZDTP-059)
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2019136)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81922040, 81930053, 81527805, 81772012)
- Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7182109)
- National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0205200, 2017YFA0700401, 2016YFA0100902)
- Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB32030200, XDB01030200)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Keywords
- rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, pathological response prediction, multiparametric MRI, whole slide imaging, tumor regression grade, locally advanced rectal cancer, treatment planning, overall survival, disease-free survival
- MeSH terms
- Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Rectal Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Neoadjuvant Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review