The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial Activity of 10 Different Plant Polyphenols against Bacteria Causing Food-Borne Disease
Open accessAbstract
The antibacterial activities of 10 different plant polyphenols were evaluated by comparing their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against several food-borne pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (20 strains), some serotypes of the genus Salmonella (26 strains), Escherichia coli (23 strains), and some species of the genus Vibrio (27 strains). The polyphenols examined were epigallocatechin (1), epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (2), punicalagin (3), tannic acid (4), castalagin (5), prodelphinidin (6), geraniin (7), procyanidins (8), a theaflavin mixture of black tea (9), and green tea polyphenols treated with loquat polyphenol oxidase (10). The average MICs of all polyphenols against S. aureus and the genus Vibrio (192+/-91 and 162+/-165 microg/ml, respectively) were much lower than the values against the genus Salmonella and E. coli (795+/-590 and 1519+/-949 microg/ml, respectively) (p<0.01). The coefficient of variation of the MICs of all polyphenols against S. aureus was the least and that against the genus Vibrio was the greatest. The mean MICs of each plant polyphenol against S. aureus (98-389 microg/ml) and the genus Vibrio (68-488 microg/ml) were similar. The relatively lower mean MIC values of 1, 2, 5, and 6 suggest the importance of 3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl groups in antibacterial activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological Activities of Polyphenols from Grapes
Xia, E.-Q., Deng, G.-F., Guo, Y.-J., & Li, H.-B. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11020622 · Cited by 1,063
Friedman, M. (2007) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200600173 · Cited by 641
Green tea and grape seed extracts—Potential applications in food safety and quality
Perumalla, A. V. S., & Hettiarachchy, N. S. (2011) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.022 · Cited by 471
Dietary polyphenol impact on gut health and microbiota
Wan, M. L. Y., Co, V. A., & El-Nezami, H. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1744512 · Cited by 325
Fattouch, S., Caboni, P., Coroneo, V., Tuberoso, C. I. G., Angioni, A., Dessi, S., Marzouki, N., & Cabras, P. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf062614e · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Taguri, T., Tanaka, T., & Kouno, I.
- Venue
- Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
- Publisher
- Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1965-1969
- ISSN
- 0918-6158 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2140226147
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Activity of 10 Different Plant Polyphenols against Bacteria Causing Food-Borne Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1248/bpb.27.1965
- The paper
- Taguri, T., Tanaka, T., & Kouno, I. (2004). Antimicrobial Activity of 10 Different Plant Polyphenols against Bacteria Causing Food-Borne Disease. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.27.1965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.