Cited by 17Estrogen and related hormone effectsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Sulfation of estradiol in human epidermal keratinocyte

Open access
Kushida, Akira, Hattori, Kenji, Yamaguchi, Nozomi, Kobayashi, Tetsuyuki, Date, Akira, Tamura, Hiroomi·2011·Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin

Abstract

Epidermis is one of the well-known estrogen target tissues. Information regarding estrogen metabolism in epidermis is still very limited compared to that of estrogen action. In the breast cancer tissue, 17β-estradiol (E(2)) is inactivated by sulfation and the expression level of estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1) is inversely correlated with its malignancy. However, there is little datum about inactivation of estradiol in skin. In order to detect and measure E(2) and its metabolites simultaneously, we established an assay method with radio HPLC. A majority of [(3)H] labeled E(2) was converted to E(2) sulfate in normal human epidermal keratinocyte (NHEK) cells. The estimated activity of sulfotransferase toward E(2) at 20 nM was 0.11±0.01 (pmol/min/mg protein). Significant induction of estrogen sulfotransferase activity was observed in calcium-differentiated NHEK cells (0.58±0.07 (pmol/min/mg protein)). The gene expression of SULT1E1 was fifteen-fold higher in differentiated keratinocyte than in proliferating keratinocyte, whereas that of steroid sulfatase was reduced. These results suggest that E(2) inactivation is primarily mediated by SULT1E1 in keratinocyte and E(2) action is likely suppressed in epidermal differentiation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1248/bpb.34.1147

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 17

Authors
Kushida, A., Hattori, K., Yamaguchi, N., Kobayashi, T., Date, A., & Tamura, H.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Ochanomizu University (JP)
  • Procter & Gamble Japan K.K. (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Published
2011
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1147-1151
ISSN
  • 0918-6158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5215
OpenAlex
W2129076699
Cited by
17
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
estrogen sulfotransferase, SULT1E1, human epidermal keratinocytes, estrogen inactivation, steroid sulfatase, keratinocyte differentiation, calcium-induced differentiation, estrogen target tissues
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Cells, Cultured, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Estradiol, Humans, Sulfates, Sulfotransferases, Keratinocytes, DNA Primers, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review