Cited by 45Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Effect of caffeine upon maximal muscular endurance of females

PERKINS, ROBIN, WILLIAMS, MELVIN H.·1975·Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Abstract

The effect of various dosages of caffeine upon maximal endurance capacity in females was studied. The effect of caffeine upon resting heart rate (RHR), submaximal heart rate (SHR), maximal heart rate (MHR), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) was also studied. Prior to undertaking a standarized progressive workload to exhaustion on an electric bicycle ergometer, each subject consumed either a placebo, small (4 mg/kg), medium (7 mg/kg) or large (10 mg/kg) dose of caffeine. A double-blind procedure was followed. Mean times to exhaustion for the placebo, small, medium and large dosages of caffeine were, respectively, 299.5, 312.1, 299.8, and 303.2 seconds. MHR were respectively, 183.4, 185.0, 185.4, and 184.4. Maximal RPE were 16.6, 17.0, 16.3, and 17.1. The analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the drug trials for the above three variables; in addition, no significant differences were noted for the RHR, SHR, and submaximal RPE. Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusion appears warranted: A small, moderate, or large dose of caffeine exerted no significant effect upon maximal endurance time, RHR, SHR, MHR, or RPE at either submaximal or maximal workloads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/00005768-197500730-00022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The similar heart rate response at high levels of exercise is consistent with other studies using either habituated or non-habituated subjects.

    “This similar heart rate response at high levels of exercise is consistent with other studies using either habituated or non-habituated subjects [ 10 , 13 , 14 , 18 , 23 , 24 , 27 ].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 45

Authors
PERKINS, R., & WILLIAMS, M. H.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Venue
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Published
1975
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
221???224
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022659959
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
caffeine, muscular endurance, time to exhaustion, female athletes, resting heart rate, submaximal heart rate, maximal heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, caffeine dosage, ergometer exercise
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Caffeine, Drug Evaluation, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Muscles, Placebos, Sports Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review